Search for: "People v. Strong (1994)"
Results 101 - 120
of 331
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Apr 2022, 5:01 am
In Francis v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 6:01 am
Here’s a classic statement of the principle, from Shannon v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am
[This decision was made under the “old” Section 3020-a that was in effect prior to a revision in 1994.]The Appellate Division said it would apply Pell standard to determine whether the penalty is too lenient. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Smith v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 10:18 pm
Soon he became one of the central leaders in the Chicano movement and a strong proponent of Chicano nationalism. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 3:21 pm
Soon he became one of the central leaders in the Chicano movement and a strong proponent of Chicano nationalism. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 7:30 am
S. 127 (1994) , and Foster v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 3:32 pm
"Not everybody believed that check imaging was the way of the future in 1994. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 9:10 am
Let’s go past the text and look for some strong reason to ignore its plain meaning. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:26 pm
The case is made difficult by respondents’ strong arguments that they will suffer irreparable harm because, despite a congressional finding to the contrary, marijuana does have valid therapeutic purposes. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 8:13 am
Smith); and (5) the government may not target or discriminate against a religious individual or entity without strong and articulated reasons (Church of Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:24 pm
The People argue the evidence was sufficient to support a Grand Jury indictment. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:05 pm
Kenneth Vercammen & Associates Law Office helps people injured due to the negligence of others. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:52 pm
Board of Administration (1994) 30 Cal.App.4th 539, 545; Guthrey v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:51 am
Barring enforcement-stage review is a strong measure, and the case that approved it, Yakus v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 1:55 am
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am
[This decision was made under the “old” Section 3020-a that was in effect prior to a revision in 1994.]The Appellate Division said it would apply Pell standard to determine whether the penalty is too lenient. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:46 pm
” In 1994, in Dolan v. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 7:17 am
Since 1994, the employee had worked for Mercy Catholic Medical Center as a psychiatric crisis intake worker. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 6:48 am
USI Film Prods., 511 US 244, 281 (1994). [read post]
