Search for: "People v. Tims"
Results 101 - 120
of 680
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Decided on April 27, 2022 No. 60 [*1]In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, vKathy Hochul, & c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 1:12 pm
Decided on April 27, 2022 No. 60 [*1]In the Matter of Tim Harkenrider, et al., Respondents-Appellants, vKathy Hochul, & c., et al., Appellants-Respondents, et al., Respondents. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 4:22 am
Kostan Nechyporenko and Tim Lester report for CNN. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 1:59 am
We could have reached that point sooner, and after the Epic Games v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 12:27 pm
If you oppose slavery (and Dred Scott), you should oppose Roe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2022, 8:52 pm
ACT (Association for Competitive Technology) became ACT | The App Association--and in such contexts as Philips v. [read post]
10 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
However, as Frank Pasquale [1] rightly suggests in his thoughtful foreword, this is also “a collection that should be read by a wide range of audiences both in and around the legal profession” (p v). [read post]
27 Feb 2022, 4:30 pm
Baroness Chapman, a shadow cabinet minister, has received an apology, substantial damages and legal costs from the Sunday Times’ chief political commentator, Tim Shipman, for tweets that suggested Chapman had an affair with Sir Keir Starmer. [read post]
12 Feb 2022, 10:19 pm
Comments on social media--or even court filings, such as in Coronavirus Reporter v. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
That’s what I did when I picked Tim Scott as Senator of South Carolina. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 7:41 am
Lindsey Graham and Tim Scott of South Carolina. [read post]
27 Jan 2022, 9:51 pm
Wow, this Epic Games v. [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
Circuit Opinion in Atchley v. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
In the old days, people sometimes bought games because of appealing box designs, but threw them away after an hour or so of playing.If impulse purchases were banned, and with Apple having made it pretty much impossible to make serious money on iOS with in-game advertising, the business model might shift to subscriptions--which Apple would probably even prefer.That said, it definitely is interesting when a federal judge dealing with a case like Epic v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
My next app will have a subscription model, but also IAP offerings.Shortly before the Epic Games v. [read post]
25 Oct 2021, 1:31 pm
These are apparently go-to accessories for people who don’t have skin. 5. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 4:09 am
But in James v. [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 9:37 am
But what makes social media platforms different is their ability to shape public discourse not by promoting their own messages but by silencing voices they deem to be harmful…. the bottleneck position that comes with control of these platforms brings with it a remarkable power to censor” By virtue of making publication decisions, every publisher necessarily “silences” the voices of people it chooses not to publish. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 10:05 pm
Some changes may be coming to the App Store after the district court decision in the Apple v. [read post]
