Search for: "People v. Toms" Results 101 - 120 of 1,505
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2008, 1:03 pm
Eli Lilly Trial: Focus Is On What Was Known About This Alleged Side Effect, And When They Knew It (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) News reports about the case Alaska v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:22 am
Jury Awards $2.6 Million For Inflammatory Bowel Disease Side Effect (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On May 29, 2007 a New Jersey state court jury handed down a $2.619 million verdict against pharmaceutical company Hoffman-La Roche Inc. for the failure to warn that its acne drug Accutane can cause inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as alleged in the Complaint for the lawsuit Andrew McCarrell v. [read post]
17 Aug 2017, 4:21 pm by INFORRM
Serious harm Relying on Mr Justice Dingemans’ comments at paragraph 47 of Sobrinho v Impresa Publishing SA [2016] EWHC 66 (QB), it was submitted on behalf of Mr Singh that an allegation of sexual assault to senior management against a clinical member of staff at a hospital dealing with highly vulnerable patients is so obviously serious, that evidence is not even necessary, notwithstanding that publication was made only to two people. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 4:32 am by SHG
Nobody, but nobody, expected a different outcome after oral argument in Florence v. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 12:35 am by Mark Summerfield
Then he set about applying great American ingenuity to the task, as provided by great Americans like Dr Wernher Von Braun, who was flexible enough to move from the V-2 to the Saturn V since, as the equally great American political analyst Tom Lehrer would later put it, 'Once ze rockets go up, who cares vere zey come down: zat's not my department...'.Read more » [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 11:50 am
Amy Schwebel, ‘International Law and Indigenous Peoples’ Rights: What Next for the Chagossians? [read post]
26 Feb 2015, 9:19 am by Maureen Johnston
Alabama adopts a new substantive rule that applies retroactively on collateral review to people condemned as juveniles to die in prison. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The State of New York Court of Appeals strictly limited “all persons-present” warrants in People v. [read post]
30 Jul 2016, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
In order to be defamatory, a statement must make the claimant identifiable (whether explicitly or not) and carry a meaning that adversely affects the attitude of other people towards the subject. [read post]