Search for: "People v. Vis" Results 101 - 120 of 1,592
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
(vi) More generally, demonisation of populism ignores its positive democratic potential. [read post]
9 Jun 2008, 10:50 pm
For starters, surely the emergency rehousing would be effected under Part VI Housing Act 1996 not Part VII. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 10:00 pm
Designs can leave some people spinning aroundAlthough it is a case management decision, there are so many hints in the recent decision Spin Master v PMS [2017] EWHC 1477 (Pat) that Mr Justice Carr wants the judgment to get wider circulation. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
There are a number of steel plate antidumping orders in effect:certain hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy plate originating in or exported from the People's Republic of China (Plate III);certain hot-rolled carbon steel plate and high-strength low-alloy steel plate originating in or exported from the Republic of Bulgaria, the Czech Republic and Romania (Plate V); andcertain carbon steel plate and high strength low alloy steel plate originating in or… [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 9:21 am by Chijioke Okorie
As this Kat reported here, a High Court in Gauteng Division in 2021 granted a motion filed by BlindSA in Blind SA v Minister of Trade, Industry and Competition (14996/21) challenging the constitutionality of South Africa's current Copyright Act on the grounds that the statute limits people with visual and print disabilities from accessing copyright-protected materials in formats such as Braille, among others.Ramifications?? [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 3:47 am by Jani
Ihalainen clearly is more unique in an Anglo setting vis-a-vis a Finnish setting). [read post]
2 Apr 2015, 3:34 pm by Stephen Bilkis
As a corollary to the right to criminal counsel, non-English speaking individuals have the right to an interpreter to enable them to participate meaningfully in their trial and assist in their own defense (see People v Ramos, 26 NY2d 272, 274 [1970]; People v Perez, 198 AD2d 446, 447 [1993]; People v De Armas, 106 AD2d 659). [read post]