Search for: "People v. Way"
Results 101 - 120
of 30,830
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Sep 2010, 11:05 am
From Byrum v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:17 pm
Which you seem to know, by the way. [read post]
23 Apr 2018, 6:32 am
In R v. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 1:55 pm
” (People v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:45 pm
Including a variety of interesting people and hotspots. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 10:40 am
Moreover, there's no reason for it; there's plenty of ways to solve this problem without violating the Constitution.Were I John Sansone -- County Counsel for San Diego -- I would have confessed error in this one. [read post]
10 Jun 2020, 2:33 pm
Probably not many of the people who passed (or voted for) Prop. 57 in 2016.Yet, there you have it.Now, as a practical reality, I doubt that Mr. [read post]
11 Mar 2014, 11:30 am
”—Laura Kalman “The American people have reconstructed their constitutional system from time to time, but these ‘constitutional moments’ never roll out exactly the same way. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:31 pm
(People v. [read post]
16 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
By contrast, for people who perhaps look differently than I do, it might make a very big difference indeed, and affect in a very nontrivial way how they experience their daily lives.Not that any opinion by the California Court of Appeal is going to solve the underlying problem, of course. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 5:15 am
13 Ways of Looking at Dred ScottJack M. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:45 pm
But notice that the caption is "People v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:18 am
" Koon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2007, 10:44 am
But, usually, merely by reference to how they've framed the case, you can tell which way it's coming out.But not here.Indeed, I was sufficiently surprised at the outcome that I wonder whether the draft opinion before oral argument had the case coming out the other way. 'Cause Justice Benke's opinion definitely reads as if she's zigging. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 1:49 pm
SEPTA v. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 1:57 pm
Which, by the way, means that the result here should likely go the other way. [read post]
17 Jul 2007, 4:32 pm
Here's a great way to illegally kick Hispanics off your jury, at least if you've got a Hispanic defendant and/or witnesses who will testify in Spanish:Ask all the prospective jurors whether they speak Spanish fluently. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 1:48 pm
There's a California Supreme Court case called People v. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 12:24 pm
Hold up your pants a different way. [read post]
10 Jan 2015, 6:15 am
Arguing for a small church in Arizona and its pastor challenging a sign law in the case of Reed v. [read post]
