Search for: "People v. Wells (1985)" Results 101 - 120 of 919
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2008, 3:34 pm
Santarelli, 778 F.2d 609, 616 (11th Cir. 1985)); see also, e.g., United States v. [read post]
29 Jul 2017, 4:22 pm
In a recent decision, Devore-Thompson v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
As is well known, at the common law, following Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2011] 1 WLR 1985, “defamatory” incorporates a qualification or threshold of seriousness: “the publication of which [a claimant] complains may be defamatory of him because it [substantially] affects in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards him, or has a tendency to do so. [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
As many people have already emailed me to tell me (alright, four people, all of them lovely), McCann v United Kingdom 19009/04 was handed down today. [read post]
18 Mar 2008, 12:10 pm
(citing United States v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 7:50 am by Eugene Volokh
Louisiana, 379 U.S. 64, 67 (1964) (taking the same view as Herbert); In re Gronowicz, 764 F.2d 983, 988 & n.4 (3d Cir. 1985) (en banc) (likewise); Phelps v. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 3:44 pm by Dave
 They built an extension (well, they jointly financed it, he built it with his family and friends). [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:51 am
  People generally enjoy watching people play games well and, if there is an audience for the virtual version of a chess game such as Karpov v Kasparov, should publishers and developers prevent people from filming it? [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 8:56 am by Scott Bomboy
Justice John Paul Stevens’ Tuesday op-ed in the New York Times called for a repeal of the Second Amendment, which guarantees “a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. [read post]
2 Nov 2011, 2:10 pm by Jonathan Brun
 We imagine there was a lot of competition to get that refinery, and it was the economic mainstay of the town of Port Colborne until 1985 when it closed. [read post]
25 May 2014, 4:04 am by J
It might well just be me, but I’m not sure what the practical purpose of the “extended” right of appeal in s.176B, CLRA 2002 is. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 9:41 pm
  And some people wonder why we have so many fewer actual trials anymore. [read post]