Search for: "People v. Witt"
Results 101 - 120
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2022, 3:22 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Peter Margulies explained the Supreme Court’s decision in Biden v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 10:31 am
Susan Hennessey and Ben Wittes considered how the trend of Trump administration officials publicly countering Trump will affect the future of the executive office. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
17 May 2017, 10:20 am
Nine people were injured and two were arrested. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:51 am
Benjamin Wittes sat down with Roger Parloff to discuss the Oath Keeper trial now that the case has gone to the jury. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 1:13 pm
They deny people their civil rights. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm
Jurecic and Benjamin Wittes investigated whether Rep. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 12:31 pm
Benjamin Wittes explained how Ketanji Brown Jackson’s representation of Guantánamo detainees was a service to the justice system. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 11:23 am
President Thomas V. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 10:20 am
Ben reviewed the two big questions at issue in Washington v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am
As of today, five people are sanctioned under EO 13611, including former President of Yemen Ali Abdullah Saleh. [read post]
15 May 2022, 12:25 am
John Witte Jr, ‘Law at the Backbone: The Christian Legal Ecumenism of Norman Doe’. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 11:00 am
That is, the Constitution does not afford people positive rights, but merely prevents the government from infringing such pre-existing freedoms. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 6:55 am
Tamara Cofman Wittes moderated. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:22 am
It held: Because the Witherspoon-Witt standard is rooted in the constitutional right to an impartial jury, Wainwright v. [read post]
3 Jan 2017, 9:28 am
Andrew Kent weighed in on Hernandez v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 11:18 am
ICYMI: Yesterday, on Lawfare Andrew Keane Woods summarized the key issues to watch as Microsoft v. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 8:48 am
Finally, in concluding his analysis of the constitutionality of the relevant chapter of the Act, MacMenamin J referred to Demir v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 6:09 am
I don’t go there — it is the core proposition rejected by the Wittes letter. [read post]
21 Feb 2018, 7:00 am
The result is “believable videos of people doing and saying things they never did. [read post]
