Search for: "Person v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2016, 5:55 am
It would seem that his IP did not play a major role in his thinking as he applied his staunch conservatism to a variety of subjects.Against that background, this Kat found particularly interesting Justice Scalia's decision in the case of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 12:57 pm by Pierre Bergeron
Whirlpool Corp. and the Supreme Court’s decision in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 1:37 am
According to one report, in the weeks following the decision, more than 20 such actions were filed against retailers including Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Corporation, Coach Inc., Nordstrom Inc., Macy’s Inc. and Best Buy Co. [read post]
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
More specifically, the Court is expected to clarify what it means to have a class action “trial by formula,” of which the Court first disapproved in 2011 in Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 9:17 am by Frankl & Kominsky, P.A.
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., which required the Second District Court of Appeal to determine whether a plaintiff’s military records were discoverable in his personal injury case. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 11:00 am by Brien Roche
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 766 N.E.2d 1118 (Ill. 2002), the Court took a somewhat different position noting that, in this instance, Wal-Mart was aware not only of Happel’s drug allergies but also that the particular medication was contraindicated for persons such as Happel that had an allergy to medicine. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 141 F.3d 1453, 1456 (11th Cir.1998) (emphasis added).Due to the overall similarity between the standards, this Court in Reis found "no appreciable difference in applying the standard articulated by the Supreme Court in [ Burlington ] and the standard articulated by the Eleventh Circuit in Doe. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:16 am by Mike Goldstein
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 914 NE 2d 59, the difference or reduction in salary from the time an employee was wrongfully terminated to their new job, front pay damages must be "proven with reasonable certainty,". [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 8:16 am by Mike Goldstein
Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 914 NE 2d 59, the difference or reduction in salary from the time an employee was wrongfully terminated to their new job, front pay damages must be "proven with reasonable certainty,". [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 8:36 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
We have recounted numerous efforts by the plaintiffs’ class action bar to “work around” the re-invigorated class certification requirements of Rule 23 in the wake of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. [read post]