Search for: "Phillip J Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 209
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jul 2011, 1:25 pm by WIMS
Smith Generating Station coal-fired CFB Boiler Project (Smith), Conoco Phillips and Peabody's Kentucky NewGas Synthetic Natural Gas Production plant (NewGas), and Cash Creek Generation LLC's coal-fired Cash Creek Generating Station (Cash Creek). [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 5:30 pm by INFORRM
  First there was a review by Tony Smith (of Arlidge, Eady and Smith and 5RB). [read post]
1 May 2010, 7:52 am by INFORRM
  First there is a strike out application in the case of Hays plc v Hartley to be heard by Tugendhat J. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am by INFORRM
On Friday 25 May 2012, Tugendhat J will hand down judgment in the case of Trim [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
”‘ (Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II, LP., v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimp, LLP, 265 AD2d at 210.) [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm by INFORRM
On 26 July 2022, there were hearings in Dyson v MGN Limited before Nicklin J and Smith -v- Baker and another before Griffiths J. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
Judgement was handed down in Sayed Zulfikar Abbas Bukhari v Syed Tauqeer Bukhari [2022] EWHC 173 (QB) on the 1 February 2022 by Murray J. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 19-20 May 2022, there was a hearing in Graeme Smith & 375 Others v Talk Talk Telecom Group PLC before Saini J. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian covers the ongoing defamation case between Ben Roberts Smith and the Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm by INFORRM
” Read Percy Preston’s (Brett Wilson LLP) interview about the May 2022 High Court’s decision in Smith and others v TalkTalk Telecom Group plc [2022] EWHC 1311 (QB). [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Steyn J heard an application in the case of Ince Group v Persons Unknown On 27 April 2022 Nicklin J heard a mode of trial application in the case of Blake v Fox. [read post]