Search for: "Pike v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 293
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Feb 2018, 4:26 pm by Adam Thimmesch
So difficult, in fact, that the Supreme Court hasn’t actually struck down a state statute using Pike balancing since the 1980s. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm by Orin Kerr
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 1:37 pm by Asbestos Legal Center
As you are aware, the TDP states that –Claims involving Disease Levels I–V, VII and VIII that do not meet the presumptiveMedical/Exposure Criteria for the relevant Disease Level may undergo the Asbestos Trust’s Individual Review Process described in Section 5.3(b). [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:25 pm by Krista M. Cabrera
Add to this discussion a new California appellate court decision, Levi v. [read post]
17 Sep 2017, 9:30 pm by Cary Coglianese
Even when no federal law exists to conflict with state or local regulation, subnational rules can be unlawful if their burden on interstate commerce is “clearly excessive in relation to the putative local benefits”—a test the Supreme Court announced in Pike v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
In a partial concurrence and partial dissent, Judge Moore stated that she would have reversed the lower court’s opinion in its entirety (Daniels v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
8 May 2017, 1:45 am by INFORRM
Pike, Northwestern University Pritzker School of Law. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 8:22 am
Pike stated [at 57] that the distinctive character of the "Willow Tea Rooms" mark lies firstly in the words, and secondly in their stylisation. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]