Search for: "Pillars v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 466
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 May 2013, 7:19 am
Fraser discusses Northwest, Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
One speaks here about legal risk (to align the discussion with the 1st Pillar of the UN Guiding Principles), but also of business risk (aligning the markets driven, private law structures of the UNGP 2nd Pillar).Pix credit hereMore importantly, the sort of risk that one encounters here, in comparing the liberal democratic and Marxist-Leninist models of human rights and sustainability, is intimately tied to the principle of "prevent-mitigate-remedy, and its… [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:04 am
(Arista-Rea v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 9:05 am
The recent decision of the New York Appeals Division in New York State Thruway Auth. v Fenech represents an American revolution in conflict of laws with fundamental implications to cross-border litigation.The Fenech decision overturns prior precedent against foreign service of process by mail under Article 10(a) of the Hague Service Convention. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 6:39 am
United States) and June 27, 2023 (Counterman v. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 7:41 am
On March 31, 2014, the Supreme Court of the United States denied certiorari in Bank of America, N.A. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2017, 7:51 pm
These state owned enterprises (SOEs) operate where state duty and enterprise responsibility meet. [read post]
18 May 2017, 1:40 pm
Despite the Supreme Court making the Guidelines advisory in United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
Although the appeal ultimately turned on a narrow point of law, the decision of the Court raises several interesting legal issues of wider importance: first, the status of “third pillar measures” under UK law and second, the application of various principles of statutory interpretation. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 9:01 pm
With its five guiding pillars, the Strategy codifies disparate cybersecurity actions across states and private industry by (i) advocating for legislation to protect national critical infrastructure; (ii) emphasizing threat actor deterrence and detection by officially declaring ransomware as a national security threat; (iii) proposing to shape market activity through government purchasing and proposed legislation; (iv) seeking public-private investment in cybersecurity resilience;… [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 3:23 pm
The case, Klayman v. [read post]
13 Mar 2020, 5:00 am
See Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 19–21. [read post]
12 May 2011, 3:39 am
As every schoolboy knows, the sentencing reforms contained in the 1996 revisions to the criminal code were pretty much trashed in State v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 11:53 am
By Daniel RichardsonState v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 5:10 pm
" I ran across it this morning as I was preparing to teach United States Department of Agriculture v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 pm
The case of ABC v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 8:46 am
Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 12:36 pm
Co. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 10:06 am
In Buck v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 4:18 pm
The cse of ATV ZRT v Hungary concerned sections 12(3) and (4) of the Act which prohibits media service providers from adding ‘any opinion or evaluative explanation to the political news’ without ‘distinguishing it from the news [itself]’. [read post]
