Search for: "Pipes v. Pipes" Results 101 - 120 of 2,320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2007, 10:28 am
The Michigan Supreme Court decided yesterday (October 31, 2007) to DENY the general contractor's Application for Leave to Appeal the Michigan Court of Appeals decision in Morris Pumps v Centerline Piping, et al., which had ruled in favor of Morris Pumps and two other suppliers. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 10:06 am
 Easier, I guess, than going through the walls vertically.But that means that once you drill through the sewage pipe, you've got to make sure to patch the pipe back up once you're done.Which the DISH Network installers didn't do here.Oopsies.You can figure out what transpired next. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 1:26 pm by Patricia W. Moore
The issue in the case was whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe... [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 7:59 am by Roger Hughes
On November 11, 2014, the California Supreme Court rejected the recent California Court of Appeals decision Golden State Boring & Pipe Jacking, Inc. v Eastern Municipal Water District,… [read post]
12 Dec 2019, 4:33 pm by Jeff Gittins
The Utah Court of Appeals recently issued its opinion in the case of Allen Family Trust v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 12:29 pm by Patricia W. Moore
Question presented: Issue: Whether the filing of a putative class action serves, under American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
28 Aug 2008, 8:18 am
Regina (Thames Water Utilities Ltd) v Bromley Magistrates Court, Environment Agency, interested party Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Sewage escaping from pipes maintained by a statutory undertaker was controlled waste within the meaning of section 33 of the Environmental Protection Act 1990. [read post]