Search for: "Pitts v. Pitts"
Results 101 - 120
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 3:08 am
" in view of the registered mark BEAST MODE, for "t-shirts" and "Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, sweatshirts; headwear, namely, hats, caps"].February 28, 2018 - 1 PM: Larr Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 10:52 am
This from Sandrine Giroud, Partner at LALIVE in Geneva:I am proud to announce that the Geneva Bar Association includes as of today the role of lawyers in the protection of human rights in its Professional Code of Conduct in accordance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:11 am
" in view of the registered mark BEAST MODE, for "t-shirts" and "Men's, women's and children's clothing, namely, shirts, sweatshirts; headwear, namely, hats, caps"].February 28, 2018 - 1 PM: Larr Pitt & Associates, P.C. v. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
There were case comments on the Panopticon Blog by Tim Pitt-Payne and Christopher Knight. [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 2:00 am
She was right, of course, and Edwards pleaded guilty to misdemeanor larceny in Pitt County last week. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 4:32 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:41 pm
The Eleventh Circuit ruled earlier this week in Morrissey v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 8:30 am
Univ. of Pitts. [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 12:23 pm
” Baxter v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
State v. [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
You went to Pitt Law during the late 80s, a time in which the libertarian legal movement had really begun to flourish, in large part because libertarians had gotten the chance to popularize their ideas (say, by debating “judicial restraint” conservatives in environments like the Federalist Society.) [read post]
16 May 2017, 12:30 pm
Jones v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 12:21 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm
Reading this and the suggestion by iPolitics quoted recently by me here, it would seem to appear that Blacklock’s wants to stay all of these lawsuits other than T-117-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 3:38 pm
Reading this and the suggestion by iPolitics quoted recently by me here, it would seem to appear that Blacklock’s wants to stay all of these lawsuits other than T-117-17 Blacklock’s v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 8:00 am
Jacqueline Wright, et al. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 8:53 am
Assn. of the Deaf v. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 10:47 am
Pitt Bridge Div. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
First American Home Buyers Protection Corp., 732 F.3d 948 (9th Cir. 2013) (discussed here); Pitts v. [read post]
