Search for: "Place Properties, L.P. "
Results 101 - 120
of 211
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2015, 11:41 am
In Bosque Canyon Ranch, L.P. v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
” The court reasoned that “[n]othing in Koontz suggests that the unconstitutional conditions doctrine under Nollan and Dolan would apply where the government simply restricts the use of property without demanding the conveyance of some identifiable protected property interest (a dedication of property or the payment of money) as a condition of approval. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2015, 5:11 pm
The ordinance itself provides that it will not apply to rental units until a 2009 appellate court decision, Palmer/Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
We apply these principles in this case to determine whether a property developer must arbitrate its claims against several defendants involved in a construction project. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 12:29 pm
We apply these principles in this case to determine whether a property developer must arbitrate its claims against several defendants involved in a construction project. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 7:02 am
BAC Home Loan Servicing, L.P., the individuals who mortgaged a property attempted to challenge a foreclosure decision reached in the lower court regarding the legality of assignment and foreclosure. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 8:00 am
See TXI Operations, L.P., 278 S.W.3d at 765; State v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 11:51 am
” (The Otay Ranch, L.P. v. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 8:45 am
Waveland North Paradigm III – B Partners ArciTerra Strategic Retail Trinity Place NetREIT Common Waveland Vanguard Partners, LLC Waveland Resource Partners 1, L.P. [read post]
26 Sep 2014, 1:51 pm
KROGER TEXAS, L.P., No. 14-0216 Set to be argued on December 9, 2014 This is a slip-and-fall case with a twist: The injured person was an employee who was cleaning up the spill: Kroger's Safety Handbook provided that store management should "make certain that the Spill Magic Spill Response Stations [were] adequately supplied at all times" and available in numerous places throughout the store. [read post]
17 Sep 2014, 10:30 am
§ 1396a(a)(30)(A) where they do not bear a reasonable relationship to provider costs and remain in place for budgetary reasons. [read post]
17 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
Separate property placed into joint ownership did not retain its character as separate property. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), because Sherman had not received a final decision on his property and seeking a final decision would not be futile. [read post]
25 May 2014, 8:34 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), because Sherman had not received a final decision on his property and seeking a final decision would not be futile. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 8:11 am
In Lennar, the Court took a hard turn to broadening policyholder's rights by limiting the application of voluntary payments provisions by appending a prejudice requirement, holding that property damage need not take place entirely within the policy period and even held carriers responsible for repairs to non-damaged property in at least some circumstances. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 4:27 am
Not much, according to a Texas court in Schmidt, L.P., L.L.C. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2014, 10:31 am
” Applying the framework from GILBERT TEXAS CONSTRUCTION, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2013, 2:53 pm
"As set forth in the comprehensive plan, the Town's primary concerns included "ensuring the community remains a great place to live, work, and visit, attracting new industry and employment opportunities, and conserving the area's natural resources and remaining open spaces." [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:25 am
Super. 2010); American Continental Properties, Inc. v. [read post]
