Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)" Results 101 - 120 of 69,612
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2010, 6:36 pm by Matthew Lerner
 The plaintiff's child was attacked by one of two dogs owned by the defendant's tenants on the plaintiff's front own front porch. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
The Plaintiff then collided with the Defendants stopped vehicle. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 7:07 am by The Docket Navigator
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's direct infringement claims for failure to state a claim was denied without prejudice. [read post]
29 Jul 2012, 3:43 pm by Ray Beckerman
Does 1-45, the plaintiff has filed its papers responding to the motion to quash filed by pro se defendant Doe #8.Plaintiff's time to respond to a separate motion filed by defendant Doe #41 has not run yet.Plaintiff's memorandum of law responding to motion by defendant Doe #8 var addthis_config = {"data_track_clickback":true}; Ray Beckerman, PC [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Forrest granted the plaintiffs motion for sanctions and ordered that judgment be entered for the defendants “planned, repeated, and comprehensive” destruction of highly-relevant documents. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:03 pm by Doug Austin
Westmore granted in part and denied in part the defendant's request to compel the plaintiff to apply its search terms to his ESI, ordering some of the search terms to be performed, despite the plaintiffs assertion that the “the application of Boolean searches was unprecedented”. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 3:19 pm by Eric Goldman
The post Plaintiffs Fire Back Against Florida’s Censorship Law–NetChoice v. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 7:21 am by Docket Navigator
"In granting [defendant's] motion to submit . . . supplemental authority, I asked the parties to address whether [Octane Fitness, LLC v. [read post]
15 Aug 2018, 7:22 am by Docket Navigator
Following summary judgment, the court granted defendant's motion to join plaintiff's founder/inventor as a necessary party and pursue attorney fees against him under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:28 am by The Docket Navigator
Defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiffs' infringement action for lack of personal jurisdiction was granted where defendant discovered that a relative of one of plaintiff's employees was the purchaser of defendant's product in the forum. [read post]
21 Jan 2023, 9:08 am by Eric Goldman
The post Fourth Circuit’s 230 Meltdown Gives Plaintiffs False Hope–Divino v. [read post]