Search for: "Plaintiff(s) v. Defendant(s)"
Results 101 - 120
of 69,797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
LaFia's alleged comments about plaintiff's race, in the context of her sexual harassment, signaled her discriminatory views on race in the workplace (Hernandez v Kaisman, 103 AD3d 106, 114-115 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Employee is Terminated After 24 Years of Service The case of Ratz-Cheung v BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. involved the plaintiff employee (the “employee”) who was an investment advisor that worked for the defendant employer (the “employer”) for 24 years, until her termination, ostensibly due to restructuring, at age 54. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 5:00 am
Employee is Terminated After 24 Years of Service The case of Ratz-Cheung v BMO Nesbitt Burns Inc. involved the plaintiff employee (the “employee”) who was an investment advisor that worked for the defendant employer (the “employer”) for 24 years, until her termination, ostensibly due to restructuring, at age 54. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:55 am
Kornegay Defendant Mother had changed residences multiple times during the child’s life, including briefly leaving the child in Father’s care while she was homeless. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 4:31 am
To state a cause of action based on a theory of unjust enrichment, a plaintiff must allege that the defendant has unjustly retained a benefit to the plaintiff’s detriment, and that defendant’s retention of the benefit violates the fundamental principles of justice, equity, and good conscience. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:41 am
Plaintiff alleges that defendants committed legal malpractice in their representation of plaintiff in prior litigations for damages stemming from mold contamination in plaintiff’s cooperative unit located in Port Chester, New York. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 3:37 am
The Appellate Division held that Scots law applied to the plaintiffs’ claims; the internal affairs doctrine was applicable because the defendants were directors, officers, and shareholders at the time of the events giving rise to the lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 8:56 pm
In this respect, the DSC’s decision shows a degree of remarkable confusion in the using the appropriate legal terminology and understanding fundamental legal concepts. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 4:16 pm
The plaintiff alleged that the defendants had defamed him on a podcast by imputing that he had murdered Shandee Blackburn. [read post]
16 Jun 2024, 6:04 am
The case is entitled Arble v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 4:21 pm
Kuciemba v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 1:46 pm
" Palkon v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:54 pm
In State of Louisiana v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 12:30 pm
Two years later, on appeal, at oral argument the district's counsel vigorously defends the mandate at oral argument. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:46 am
In French v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 11:36 am
Today’s post focuses on the social media defendants’ efforts to dismiss the parallel lawsuits by the school districts. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 9:08 am
Today's advance release civil procedure law opinion: Torrington Tax Collector, LLC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 151561/22 Appeal No. 2412 Case No. 2023-06121 [*1]Caf Dowlah, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
14 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
Index No. 151561/22 Appeal No. 2412 Case No. 2023-06121 [*1]Caf Dowlah, Plaintiff-Appellant, v Professional Staff Congress (PSC-CUNY), et al., Defendants-Respondents. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:00 pm
# # #DECISIONB. v. [read post]
