Search for: "Planned Parenthood of Georgia"
Results 101 - 118
of 118
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Feb 2019, 7:54 am
Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, Inc., 18-8 Issues: (1) Whether a state may require health-care facilities to dispose of fetal remains in the same manner as other human remains, i.e., by burial or cremation; and (2) whether a state may prohibit abortions motivated solely by the race, sex or disability of the fetus and require abortion doctors to inform patients of the prohibition. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 8:32 am
But the district court denied relief, stating that at the time of the trial, Georgia law prohibited impeaching the jury’s verdict with extrinsic evidence. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:05 pm
The topic of my Law of Religion class today was what government actors should or must do when their legal and religious obligations conflict with one another. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
By Geoffrey R. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am
John Elwood reviews Tuesday’s relists. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:01 pm
Roe embraced the trimester framework, under which states could not regulate abortion during the first trimester; could regulate it only to preserve the woman’s health during the second; and could regulate or restrict it completely, unless abortion was necessary to save the life or health of the woman, during the third trimester because its interest in protecting fetal life becomes compelling when the fetus reaches the point of viability—that is, the point when the fetus could… [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 2:42 pm
John Elwood reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am
John Elwood previews February’s likely relists. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 9:01 pm
Looking back on Roe, Justice Scalia pointed out in his (blistering) dissent in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v Casey, 505 U.S. 833, (1992), that it was a cause of the deep division in our politics: Not only did Roe not, as the Court suggests, resolve the deeply divisive issue of abortion; it did more than anything to nourish it, by elevating it to the national level where it is infinitely more difficult to resolve. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
(Pix Credit U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court became a significant issue in the 2012 presidential election. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:00 am
Yesterday, I hastily counted the votes from Ramos v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 6:21 pm
Georgia. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
In a way, it is also a mirror of the great changes and the extent of the failures of consensus, that are now reflected in the contradictions of the U.S. domestic legal order as it strives to move from what it was to what it might become.Set out below is the revised version of the introductory course materials and syllabus I plan to use this coming semester. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
En ambos casos, las contrapartes son los funcionarios representantes de cada Estado demandado, de modo que en sentido sustancial la demanda Roe era contra Texas y la Doe era contra Georgia).Advertencia: hay otra familia de "Does" que también aparece en el caso "Roe", y a la que se le deniega carácter de parte (legitimación). [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 5:09 am
HR managers must be sensitive to and investigate discrimination claims reasonably before making decisions or taking action. [read post]
