Search for: "Points v. Commissioner of Social Security"
Results 101 - 120
of 382
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm
At this point, it is simply not possible to tell if the lulls – particularly the fourth quarter lull – were simply short-term artifacts of the pandemic, or if they represent longer-term filing trends that will affect filing levels going forward. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 7:08 pm
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state unemployment benefits. [read post]
29 Nov 2020, 4:13 pm
A further 32 complaints were received by the Information Commissioners Office (ICO), who informed Elia Bols that a fine of £100,000 would be issued. [read post]
15 Nov 2020, 4:25 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has fined Ticketmaster UK Limited £1.25million for failing to keep its customers’ personal data secure. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 4:48 pm
The Information Commissioner’s Office The Information Commissioner’s Office has been remarkably quiet on the subject, which is perhaps surprising bearing in mind the increased prevalence of home working and monitoring. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 1:32 pm
The Supreme Court of Canada’s recent decision in Fraser v. [read post]
8 Oct 2020, 1:09 pm
The key point here is that security must be incorporated into the design and function of IoT devices—and that standards should be developed with industry involvement and on the basis of empirical evidence and a rigorous cost benefit analysis. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 5:18 am
In one sense, the organ could be a relatively autonomous structure (e.g. under a Commissioner-General) set up by the UNGA. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 1:26 pm
Dec. 31. 2014), the plaintiffs took issue with documents that had been produced in discovery that contained the plaintiffs' social security numbers, claiming that the mailing of these documents violated a Michigan state law against transmitting full social security numbers through the mail. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm
The extrinsic evidence points largely in the same direction. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 1:00 pm
Shelley points out that “taking to the streets is as American as the First Amendment” to express passion on any issue. [read post]
18 Jun 2020, 6:38 am
Koppelman accuses me of being too forgiving of the civil rights commissioner in Masterpiece and of the U.S. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 3:00 am
Campaign Funds for Judges Warp Criminal Justice, Study Finds New York Times – Adam Liptak | Published: 6/1/2020 In Gideon v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 11:25 am
The guidance was “clear about this to the point of pungency”. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
"Similarly, in Szumigala v Hicksville Union Free School District, 148 AD2d 621, the Appellate Division, citing Cheektowaga v Nyquest, 38 NY2d 137, held that a seniority clause in a Taylor Law agreement violated §2510 of the Education Law when it permitted seniority in different tenure areas to be combined for the purposes of determining seniority with the District for the purposes of layoff.However, in Gee v Board of Educ. of Rochester City Sch. [read post]
