Search for: "Pooler v State"
Results 101 - 120
of 307
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2016, 1:51 pm
In United States v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 6:39 am
The Court of Appeals (Carney, Livingston and Pooler) says "an informational disclosure law . . . [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 6:42 am
The district court found the village liable under the Fair Housing Act for intentional discrimination, and the Court of Appeals affirms.The case is MHANY Management v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:30 am
This case looks at an obscure provision in the FMLA.The case is Oliveria v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 6:50 am
That's what happened here.The case is Munter v. [read post]
26 Feb 2016, 8:13 am
The Court of Appeals says the County is correct as to the plaintiffs' federal law claims, but not the state law claims.The Second Circuit (Cabranes, Pooler and Chin) says Florence does in fact repudiate the Second Circuit's 1999 ruling in Shane v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 8:08 am
This is a fairly straightforward search and seizure case where the Second Circuit says the police were able to nail a guy for having an unlicensed gun at the wrong place at the wrong time.The case is United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2016, 3:52 am
While the state argues that this case cannot be filed in federal court, the Court of Appeals (Kearse, Livingston and Pooler) says that "the collateral order doctrine has been held not applicable to permit immediate appeal of decisions denying motions to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs' claims should be adjudicated in a different forum. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 6:20 am
We got such a guy in this case.The case is Dotel v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 6:22 am
That 2-1 ruling is now the subject of a debate at the Court of Appeals, which has decided not to hear the case en banc.The case is Turkmen v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
The Court of Appeals (Pooler, Calabresi and Lynch) notes that while Title VII offers no such protections, the State and City laws "expressly protect against discrimination based on both perceived as well as actual sexual orientation. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 6:58 am
In this case, the Second Circuit (Cabranes, Raggi and Pooler) reverses summary judgment, stating, "the District Court erred in holding that plaintiff’s proof that defendants’ explanation was false was 'immaterial' because she had not introduced additional, independent evidence of discrimination. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 6:38 am
So it is important.The case is Dean v. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:35 pm
United States, or its decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 4:51 am
The Circuit notes that Jackler v. [read post]
18 Aug 2015, 7:09 am
Major League Baseball Properties, Inc., August 14, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 6:53 am
The Court of Appeals rejects that challenge and rules against the religious plaintiffs.The case is Catholic Health Care System v. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 6:32 pm
Freeport Pancake House, Inc., August 7, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:18 am
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, July 23, 2015, Pooler, R.). [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 6:18 am
As stated by the Court of Appeals (Pooler, Lohier and Carney), "Defendant was aware that Plaintiff’s knee injury caused him chronic pain and that intermittent knee locking led to a periodic inability to walk. [read post]
