Search for: "Portland Company v. United States"
Results 101 - 117
of 117
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The two companies will also pay a combined $3.3 million civil penalty to the United States as well as to Alabama and Louisiana, and $200,000 to Louisiana organ [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 5:21 am
Portland Terminal Co., 330 U.S. 148 (1947) and Walling v. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 4:10 pm
We're happy to welcome them to the site: Babener & Associates, a law firm that represents companies headquartered throughout the United States and abroad. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 10:57 am
A federal inspection of the company’s Jesse Hunton Viola Unit, an oil field production facility in Pontotoc County, Oklahoma, on November 9, 2009, found the facility’s SPCC plan did not meet federal requirements, was not certified by a professional engineer, was not approved by the company’s management and did not designate the person accountable for spill prevention. [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:27 pm
HOSPITAL SETTLE FRAUD CASE FOR $3 MILLION, United States v. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
-based company that provides dairy products, warehousing, and distribution services. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm
Paul, United States Magistrate Judge Jeanne Graham fined the company $100,000 and ordered it to make a $50,000 community service payment to the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources to benefit the Rice Creek Watershed. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Afro-IP) Peru Peru approves ratification of PCT (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Philippines Government says Philippines should be removed from US government watch list, despite claims from American lobby groups (ContentAgenda) Poland DIX versus DIX or judgment versus judgment (Class 46) PPO’s invalidates figurative mark belonging to FIRMA BATCZEW Stanislaw Komperda incorporating elements similar to EU flag (Class 46) Russia Video… [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
’: (IP finance), Allied Security Trust – High-tech companies pool resources to fight trolls: (IAM), (Techdirt), (Patent Prospector), (Ars Technica), (Technological Innovation and Intellectual Property) Global - Copyright On distinguishing between creative commons, the public domain, and all rights reserved – confusion in mainstream media: (creativecommons.org), Inside views: a new business model for the music industry explained: (Intellectual Property Watch),… [read post]
5 Apr 2008, 12:06 am
United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 11:59 pm
Bartholomew Verdirame, Tony V. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 3:32 am
Andersen claims the association and a company called MediaSentry "conspired to develop a massive threat and litigation enterprise targeting private citizens across the United States. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Dissenting Member Walsh stated: Sound policy considerations underlie the statute's requirement that the showing of interest supporting a deauthorization election must be collected after the employees are subject to a union-security clause. [read post]
3 Dec 2006, 7:53 pm
v. [read post]
27 Nov 2006, 1:45 pm
The United States's amicus brief is available here. [read post]
