Search for: "Power v. California Bank" Results 101 - 120 of 792
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2011, 6:56 pm
”While acknowledging that unconscionability is a generally applicable doctrine of contract law, Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, concluded that Section 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act preempted California’s Discover Bank rule.Individual v. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:54 pm by Kirk Jenkins
As we await Thursday's oral argument before the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm by Harvard Law Review
Sachs NOTE Central Bank and Intellectual Property RECENT CASES Constitutional Law - Eighth Amendment - Eastern District of California Holds that Prisoner Release Is Necessary To Remedy Unconstitutional California Prison Conditions - Coleman v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 12:34 pm
But as you can see from the title of this blog post, a bank's administrative freeze was recently considered acceptable, in a case called Mwangi v. [read post]
27 Jul 2015, 7:43 am by Barbara S. Mishkin
Circuit, in State National Bank of Big Spring, Texas, et al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
Wildman"What Not to Wear"—The Story of Meritor Savings Bank v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 9:59 pm by Sam Eichner
On the one hand we have California’s Discover Bank rule, a judge-made doctrine based upon state unconscionability law. [read post]
28 Dec 2010, 9:06 am by Heather Darsie
I have reviewed case law in California and Florida, and have consulted the Illinois Compiled Statutes.In the case of Phu Van Nguyen v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm by Richard Frank
Supreme Court mavens focused their attention on several new opinions  the Court issued in key cases–including the major climate change decision (in American Electric Power v. [read post]