Search for: "Powers v. Parisher" Results 101 - 120 of 238
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 9:49 pm by Patricia Salkin
At the outset of the case, the court noted that a property owner holds property subject to the police power of the Parish, and does not have a vested property interest in the existing zoning of property. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:33 am by SHG
Maryland (first draft) How Caddo Parish Judge Katherine Clark Dorroh got her hands on the draft opinion is a mystery, but she certainly put it to use in her opinion in Louisiana v. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 3:38 pm by John Floyd
The new provisions give voice to the admonition in Imble v. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 7:09 am
The national Church, again, has no power to prevent a Diocese from so amending its governing documents.)To do so, he had to blur the distinctions in the cases dealing with individual parishes -- and he had to ignore the Quincy case altogether (which was not even mentioned in argument). [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 3:19 pm
(d) This section does not affect the power of the legislature to authorize a municipality to regulate the discharge of a weapon in a populated area in the interest of public safety. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 1:07 am by Janet Kentridge, Matrix
The statutory condition that the use of the land be “as of right” derives from the rules of prescriptive acquisition, which “prevent the disturbance of long-established de facto enjoyment”, as Lord Hoffman put it in R v Oxfordshire County Council, ex p Sunningwell Parish Council [2000] 1 AC 335 at p 349. [read post]
29 Sep 2014, 8:40 am
For a (rare) example in which one of these statutes comes up, see Davis v. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 2:25 pm
This case came to trial against the background of the South Carolina Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in All Saints Waccamaw Parish v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:34 am
Let's have the Press Office of the Episcopal Diocese tell us what happened on Day 7 of the trial, with ECUSA and ECSC putting on their portion of the case (I have added some explanatory notes, taken from my daily postings on the trial over at StandFirm):DAY SEVEN: DIOCESE OF SC v. [read post]