Search for: "Powers v. Powers"
Results 101 - 120
of 54,933
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
Supreme Court recently announced the scheduling of oral arguments in the biggest (actually, the only) environmental case of its current Term: American Electric Power v. [read post]
15 Aug 2022, 8:55 am
See Moore v. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 6:55 am
Express Grant of Authority v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 5:01 am
Community College v. [read post]
15 Jun 2013, 3:21 pm
See Cooley v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
Swarnim Shrivastava Supreme Court gives more teeth to the Tax Authority The Supreme Court in Kathiroor Service Cooperative Bank Ltd. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2009, 11:26 am
But I do not see Powell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 5:10 am
The conference will also cover in depth the pending Supreme Court case Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:30 pm
Geske v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 4:56 am
Lyle Denniston at SCOTUS Blog tells why the Bush administration thinks Presidents have power to order state courts to obey the World Court - in this case, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals in Meddellin v. [read post]
9 Mar 2013, 3:55 am
Immigration Preemption and the Limits of State Power: Reflections on Arizona v. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 8:51 am
Electric Power Supply Asso. v. [read post]
17 May 2007, 9:40 pm
Pecore, 2007 SCC 17, and Madsen Estate v. [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 9:28 pm
For example, in Dana v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am
Had politics been allowed to play a role in the court’s decision-making process, the outcome of Brown v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:23 am
Had politics been allowed to play a role in the court’s decision-making process, the outcome of Brown v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 7:18 am
Elias v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 8:27 am
Flores, 521 U.S. 507 (1997) and United States v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
On 15 May 2019, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the case of R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal ([2019] UKSC 22), deciding by a slim majority of 4:3 that an “ouster clause” in section 67(8) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (“RIPA”) that purports to exclude from challenge or appeal any decision of the Investigatory Powers Tribunal (“IPT”), does not… [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 2:00 am
Joondeph (Santa Clara University), The 'Horizontal Separation of Powers' after National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
