Search for: "Powers v. U.s.*"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,279
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2024, 5:38 am
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on a set of stay applications, consolidated under the caption Ohio v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 12:47 pm
Supreme Court, however, held in AMG Capital Management LLC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 6:24 pm
Chestek at 8 (Quoting JEM Broadcasting Co. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 9:00 am
U.S. history includes a long list of examples where that power has been considered or actually used. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 6:00 am
A PSC is defined as an individual who satisfies one of the following conditions: (i) has direct or indirect ownership of more than 25% of a company’s shares; (ii) has direct or indirect control of more than 25% of a company’s voting rights; (iii) has direct or indirect rights to appoint or remove a majority of the board of company directors or equivalent management body; (iv) exercises or has the right to exercise significant influence or control over a company; or (v) exercises… [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 11:27 am
Trevino v. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 9:01 pm
AI: Opportunities and Challenges AI is about using math, data, and computational power to find patterns and make predictions. [read post]
15 Feb 2024, 3:33 pm
Bose Corp. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 2:12 pm
Here, in the Reif v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 1:44 pm
Gimenez v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 9:58 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 3:50 am
See , e.g ., Kisor v. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 3:44 pm
According to the USSC: 9% had little or no prior criminal history (Criminal History Category I); 7% were CHC II; 8% were CHC III; 2% were CHC IV; 5% were CHC V; 9% were CHC VI. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 9:41 am
Newman v. [read post]
Don’t Judge a Range by its Cover: Federal Circuit Sides with Patentee on Written Description Support
11 Feb 2024, 9:43 am
RAI Strategic Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2024, 3:03 am
Though the article is set to appear in print sometime this month, it might not beat the Supreme Court's decision in Trump v. [read post]
8 Feb 2024, 1:47 pm
(Wikimedia)Today's Supreme Court oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm
As I explained in one of my earlier posts, several or all of the Justices might be inclined to decide the case on some ground that doesn’t require the Court to decide whether Donald Trump is eligible to be President, if such an “off-ramp” solution is legally available. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 12:08 pm
Moss v. [read post]
5 Feb 2024, 5:05 am
" Trump's brief on the merits in the Supreme Court in Trump v. [read post]