Search for: "Preacher v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2011, 10:28 am
Ruth V. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:59 pm
Not all speech is protected by freedom of expression rights, and not all protest is legitimate in the eyes of the state. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 4:23 am
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 2:44 am
Mustafa Kamal MUSTAFA (ABU HAMZA) (No. 1) v the United Kingdom – 31411/07 [2011] ECHR 211 (18 January 2011) – Read judgment The European Court of Human Rights has rejected radical preacher Abu Hamza’s claim that his 2005-6 trial, at which he was convicted of soliciting to murder, inciting racial hatred and terrorism charges, was unfair. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 10:30 pm
A secular judge must be wary of straying across the well-recognised divide between church and state. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:04 am
Supreme Court" in Brown v. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 9:59 pm
With its attention focussed on the 2004 Directive, the Asylum and Immigration Appeal Tribunal ruled in LC v Secretary of State for the Home Department that, despite having been in the UK for 19 years, Chindamo had “resided” in the UK within the meaning of the Directive for less than 10 years, as 10 of those years had been spent in prison. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:58 pm
It has been widely debated in recent cases (R (Smith) v Secretary for Defence [2010] UKSC 29 (see our post); Al-Skeini & Others v Secretary of State for Defence [2008] 1 AC 153, currently before the Grand Chamber; Bankovic v Belgium [2001] 11 BHRC 435) whether Article 1 ECHR guarantees the rights and freedoms of the Convention to those outside of the State’s jurisdiction. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 4:10 am
Zipursky, Snyder v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:01 am
Defense attorney Hilliard V. [read post]
2 Oct 2010, 9:13 am
United States Hollis King Kentucky v. [read post]
3 Sep 2010, 6:26 am
For example, in Khan v Government of the United States of America, Mr Khan failed to convince the High Court that the United States justice system was inherently unfair. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:00 pm
And some stories we've been hearing from some of the plaintiffs in Donaldson and Guggenheim v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 4:33 am
In Sonnier v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 4:05 am
In Afriyie v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
And in Sullivan v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 12:15 pm
United States.) [read post]
20 Apr 2010, 10:12 am
United States, 283 F.2d 430 (9th Cir.1960) (threat of damage to property was made merely by mentioning troubles that other contractors had had); People v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:37 am
” At Vanity Fair, Andrew Cohen has a piece on Kansas-based preacher Fred Phelps, one of the respondents in Snyder v. [read post]
