Search for: "Precision Process, Inc. v Smith" Results 101 - 120 of 135
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am by Steve Bainbridge
Nonshareholder corporate constituencies can thus “negotiate” with the board in precisely the same fashion as do shareholders: by withholding their inputs. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 10:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Eisman of counsel), amicus curiae pro se.Morningside Heights Legal Services, Inc., New York, NY (Elora Mukherjee, National Immigrant Justice Center [Mark Fleming and Katherine Melloy Goettel], pro se, and Christopher N. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
Randy Smith accusing the panel's majority of writing new law saying "We have never held that an actress' performance could be copyrightable". [read post]
19 May 2016, 1:37 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
 Andrew Moore, Kevin Amer, Regan Smith, Jason Sloan Ben Sheffner, Motion Picture Association of America: Consensus that there should be some sort of streamlined process as to previously granted exemption: waste of time for proponents and CO staff to go through full process w/no meaningful opposition. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Connaught Laboratories, Inc., 658 A2d 715, 718 (N.J. 1995); Nelson v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
This may inflict precisely the kind of societal harm the Founders adopted the First Amendment to protect against . . . . [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:06 pm by Dorothy
STANDARD CHARTERED BANK INTERNATIONAL (AMERICAS) LIMITED and STANCHART SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL, INC., Defendants. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:55 pm by Drew Falkenstein
McClung, 379 U.S. 294 (1964) (restaurants utilizing substantial interstate supplies); and Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. [read post]