Search for: "Presley v. Presley"
Results 101 - 120
of 150
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2010, 10:41 pm
Recent cases such as Presley v. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 10:42 am
The United States Supreme Court recently addressed the issue of public trials in the case of Presley v. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 7:44 am
In overturning the conviction based on Sixth Amendment arguments, the First Circuit Court of Appeals cited Presley v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 4:20 am
As I'm sitting here working on a short comment on Tom Russell's article on William Simkins, I see (Presley v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 12:39 pm
The Appeals Court cited Presley v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
Upton, holding that a court of appeals failed to consider a death penalty defendant’s arguments in support of his claim that his attorney failed to investigate mitigating evidence; Presley v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:35 pm
Haynes (peremptory challenges) Presley v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:17 pm
So here's an excerpt about a kooky little copyright case called Strachborneo v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 2:13 pm
Something like that.Maybe I got this sense from a vague cultural memory of the Elvis Presley film, where he plays a leather-jacketed biker who's fired from a singing gig after he gets into a fight with some college toughs. [read post]
6 May 2010, 2:39 pm
Univ. for Women v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 11:07 am
Franklin Mint Company v. [read post]
29 Apr 2010, 11:33 am
Hall and Presley v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 2:54 pm
Hall argument 1/19/2010 Presley v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 9:58 am
In this particular case, Presley v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 9:31 am
Click here to read Presley v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 7:17 am
” Finally, Lyrissa Lidsky at PrawfsBlog covers the Court’s decision in Presley v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 10:49 am
Presley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 2:46 pm
Supreme Court just decided an interesting case on this subject, called Presley v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 3:03 pm
Presley v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 11:20 am
An autopsy performed on the toddler allegedly revealed the presence of multiple toxic drugs, including oxycodone.Judge Muehlfeld's well-intentioned, but ham-fisted, attempt to prevent the jury pool from becoming tainted by prejudicial pretrial publicity is particularly egregious in that it occurred the same week in which the High Court held in a 7-2 decision in Presley v. [read post]
