Search for: "Price v. District of Columbia" Results 101 - 120 of 498
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
In May 2016, a national investigation was initiated by the Attorneys General of 46 states and the District of Columbia as to whether DC’s consumer Protection Procedures Act (the “CPPA”) and similar acts of other states have been violated by deceptive price advertising techniques related to drip pricing regarding Resort Fees. [read post]
16 Feb 2015, 1:07 pm
Attorney’s Office for the District of Columbia began an investigation into the company’s marketing and promotional practices, causing Abiomed stock prices to fall. [read post]
25 Mar 2020, 1:16 pm by FHH Law
Information subject to ARMIS reporting also may vary depending on whether a carrier is a mid-size or large ILEC or a mandatory price-cap, elective price-cap, or non-price-cap ILEC. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 6:35 am by Joy Waltemath
Adequate evidence was presented at trial to support a jury’s verdict in favor of a District of Columbia health department employee who was subject to retaliation—leading to her constructive discharge—following her candid, truthful testimony before the D.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 8:41 am
Although same-sex marriage is available in 13 states and the District of Columbia, couples that establish residences outside of those states may not be able to obtain a divorce. [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 2:20 pm
On Monday, April 16, the Court will hear argument in Powerex Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:14 pm by William A. Ruskin
Suko, a federal district court judge sitting in the Eastern District of Washington, ruled on April 4, 2012, that PRP Teck Cominco Metals, Ltd. failed to prove that contamination at a CERCLA site was divisible and, as a result, will be subject to CERCLA 107 joint and several liability at an upcoming September 2012 bench trial (Pakootas v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 10:43 am
According to the opinion, "The Court is advised without contradiction that not only the Federal Government, including the District of Columbia, but 43 States take the first step toward appointing counsel before, at, or just after initial appearance. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Key Findings Twenty-three states and the District of Columbia had notable tax changes take effect on July 1, 2019. [read post]