Search for: "Price v. Pierce"
Results 101 - 120
of 195
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm
(Mass.) 1999); Kim v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 6:53 am
Are independent actors setting the price or is the promoter supporting the secondary market for the asset or otherwise influencing trading? [read post]
21 Jan 2008, 4:10 am
Nelson v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 11:28 am
Dick Pierce also looked at that issue, along with several others (potential rules to address reverse-payment settlements in the pharmaceutical industry, below-cost pricing, and non-compete clauses involving low-wage workers). [read post]
24 Jul 2020, 6:10 am
Anders, and Sabastian V. [read post]
31 Oct 2007, 5:31 am
Turning to whether the class action complaint was properly dismissed, the Ninth Circuit held that Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Hall v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 5:55 am
In Chicago, for example, car rental customers pay a 5 percent Illinois state car rental tax, a 6 percent excise tax levied by the city’s Metropolitan Pier and Exposition Authority (MPEA), and another 9 percent personal property lease transaction tax levied by the city of Chicago.[4] State car rental excise taxes are applied either on an ad valorem basis, where the tax applies to a percentage of the sale price, or as a flat dollar amount. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:11 am
Richard Pierce, GWU Law Article III: it’s fine to take a class of disputes previously disputed by Art. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm
” Ashcroft v. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:11 am
This line of authority—much of it pre-dating the Supreme Court's decision in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:16 am
See Bauman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2019, 9:05 am
(directors’ duty to maximize share price in corporate takeover) Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Governance Meinhard v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 6:11 am
All opinions are precedential unless otherwise indicated.Wechsler v. [read post]
19 Jun 2008, 11:58 pm
"In Tonneson v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 3:34 am
State Law” Practice Area, the US Supreme Court unanimously held – in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith v. [read post]
18 Sep 2009, 4:59 pm
" [Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. ]Dabit , 547 U.S. [71,] 87 [(2006)]. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 2:57 pm
In SEC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court will hear Harrington v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 8:00 am
(The court said the outcome would change if there were a basis to pierce the defendants’ corporate veil or an alter ego situation.)Dean v. [read post]
