Search for: "Pruitt v. State " Results 101 - 120 of 138
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2011, 10:33 am by Bexis
Western States Medical Center, 535 U.S. 357 (2002).Masoudi & Pruitt, “The Food & Drug Administration v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 9:42 am by Steve Hall
“Oklahoma Attorney General Scott Pruitt has filed a notice of appeal to the stay of execution,” Crenshaw said. [read post]
4 Jan 2017, 4:45 am by Charles Sartain
Sentence: Awaiting, after an eight day trial. __________ Perp: Susan Gay Pruitt Offense: State securities fraud. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court case, Lucia v. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
21 Aug 2013, 5:39 pm by Steven M. Taber
AK Steel’s coke plant in Ashland, KY was alleged to have violated the plant’s Title V permit and the KY State Implementation Plan. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 4:32 am
The state fares worse in State v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 7:08 am by Lawrence Solum
Faced with persistent unemployment, a nationwide foreclosure crisis, deep cuts to state and local budgets, and declining state support for public education, Americans are questioning the promise of upward mobility. [read post]
Recent developments have suggested that Scott Pruitt, the EPA’s newly-appointed head, intends to cut funding to environmental programs and steer the onus of running such programs onto state governments. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 11:13 am by Jonathan H. Adler
For the second time this week, a federal court has rejected the EPA's effort to delay an Obama Administration rule.Today, in Air Alliance Houston v. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 5:25 am by Bobby Chen
Hodges, Lawrence v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]