Search for: "Public Service, Etc. v. Public Util., Etc."
Results 101 - 120
of 295
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Bypassing the telecoms: 'Stingrays' allow direct government phone surveillance with little oversight
9 Mar 2013, 1:41 pm
The US military utilizes similar technology developed by Boeing and it's also used extensively by American intelligence services. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 12:15 am
The doctrine of inherent anticipation (particularly after Schering Co. v Geneva Pharmaceuticals Inc. et Al., commented here - see also, in the UK, Merrell Dow v H N Norton & Co), may lead to similar distortions. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:40 am
It contains, among other things, articles on (i) the US Supreme Court’s damages analysis in Lucent v Microsoft from an economist’s perspective which proposes new guidelines for evaluating patent damages in concentrated, high tech industries and (ii) the evolution of quilts from utility items to works of art proposing strong copyright law protection for quilt designs. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 8:21 am
AB 1595 would have required public and private mass transportation providers (bus, train, light rail, etc.) to provide human-trafficking training to their employees who are likely to interact with victims of human trafficking. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 10:03 am
Supreme Court in Decker v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 3:37 am
But what about the disrupting public services/criminal damaging charges? [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 10:16 pm
Supreme Court’s controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 5:49 am
In 2005, the Supreme Court considered inducement liability for copyright infringement in MGM v Grokster. [read post]
24 May 2012, 6:51 am
In a perfectly transparent market all relevant information about a market transaction from the price, order size, order flow, trading volume, identity of the traders/counterparties, all bids and offers available, etc. would theoretically be discoverable. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:17 am
” Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2017, 12:17 am
” Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 10:50 am
In the end, the City rejected the mixed use alternative as infeasible because it would have greater environmental impacts than the proposed project with respect to services and utilities. [read post]
19 Apr 2021, 9:22 am
In SEC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 10:43 pm
" The underlying content (videos, pictures, etc.) is uploaded to third party services or servers. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am
As it stands today, however, California businesses that are open to the public are still obligated to offer their goods and services in a non-discriminatory manner that comp [read post]
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm
[iii] Springer v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 8:07 am
BCES utilizes . . . [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 5:30 am
Depending on the circumstances of the conflict (the provider of the service, the parties involved, the type of dispute, etc.), certain forms of ODR, such as e-negotiation, e-mediation, or e-arbitration may be encountered. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 5:12 am
Dimeo v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 8:07 am
But, if you work in Administration or Public Services, you may be reading about it here for the first time. [read post]
