Search for: "Purchase v. Meyer"
Results 101 - 120
of 127
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2015, 10:05 am
These questions, among others, find a response in yesterday's judgment of High Court for England and Wales, Chancery Division, ruling of Mr Justice Arnold in Enterprise Holdings Inc v Europcar Group UK and Another[2015] EWHC 17 (Ch).BackgroundEnterprise and Europcar are two heavyweights of the car rental market. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:41 am
Troia v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:00 am
A few hours after the OPPO v. [read post]
15 Sep 2020, 11:02 am
; Meyer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 5:12 pm
In an effort to resolve the disputes, T&S sent RLC an offer to trigger a buy/sell purchase option under the LLC agreement–but that was not accepted and did not result in either a purchase or a sale of either member’s interest. [read post]
22 Jun 2007, 11:27 am
Hanninen v. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 9:02 am
Paris Baguette Am., Inc., 861 F.3d 76 (2d Cir. 2017); and Meyers v. [read post]
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
31 May 2021, 9:02 am
Website accessibility experts The discussion of website accessibility expertise in Meyer v. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 12:30 pm
Or click here for a nice little article on the exciting backstory to Meyer v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 8:37 pm
Practical Considerations for D&O Policies Delaware entities typically purchase D&O policies to cover the costs of indemnification or advancement or to provide coverage where indemnification is unavailable. [read post]
21 Oct 2012, 6:47 pm
[1] Jacoby & Meyers, LLP v. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 11:33 am
Which questions should we follow up on to give us purchase on questions for legal scholars/regulators? [read post]
22 May 2011, 4:03 am
NoveltyThe test for determining whether the invention lacks novelty is the ‘reverse infringement test’ as set out in Meyers Taylor Pty Ltd v Vicarr Industries Ltd (1977) 137 CLR 228 where Aickin J stated (at 235):‘The basic test for anticipation or want of novelty is the same as that for infringement and generally one can properly ask whether the alleged anticipation would, if the patent were valid, constitute an infringement’. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 6:56 am
Case law The Spencer v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am
By not purchasing any such rights in the work, Grande, Lamar, and their production company precluded Kush and Viktor from being compensated for their labor. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Favre (Michigan State), Katherine Anne Meyer (Meyer Glitzenstein & Crystal, Washington, D.C.). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Buy healthy, buy local: an analysis of potential legal challenges to state and local government local purchase preferences. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 11:11 am
Meyer (1891). [read post]
