Search for: "Queen v. Queen" Results 101 - 120 of 4,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2009, 2:06 am
Hoholm v Government of Norway Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “Where an issue was available to be raised by a claimant on the evidence adduced at an extradition hearing, she was entitled to raise that issue on appeal to the Divisional Court, even though it had not been raised before. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 1:57 am
Gidden v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen's Bench Division "In times of postal disruption, prosecuting authorities should not rely on ordinary first-class post for serving notices of intended prosecution. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:03 am by traceydennis
Regina (Coombes) v Waltham Forest London Borough Council Queen’s Bench Division “Section 3 of the Protection from Eviction Act 1977 was not incompatible with article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 2:03 am
Regina (Webster) v Swindon Local Safeguarding Children Board Queen’s Bench Division “It was not necessary for a local safeguarding children board to wait for the outcome of civil proceedings before conducting a substantive and comprehensive serious case review. [read post]
25 Nov 2009, 1:46 am
Thomas v Director of Public Prosecutions Queen's Bench Divisional Court "Vulnerable homeless persons in rooms in local authority hostels with a licence to occupy for a day a bedroom with a lock, were as entitled to the protection of the law as anyone else and could exclude trespassers. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 3:42 am by sally
Regina (Quila) v Secretary of State for the Home Department Queen’s Bench Division “Age discrimination against immigrant spouses aged under 21 was justified. [read post]
10 Dec 2008, 10:43 am
Louca v Public Prosecutor, Bielefeld, Germany Kaba v Court of First Instance, Creteil, France Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “While a European arrest warrant had to be validated by reference to an enforceable national legal procedure, it need not refer to any other European arrest warrant that might previously have been issued in respect of the alleged offences [...] [read post]
30 May 2008, 1:33 am
Regina (Smith) v Assistant Deputy Coroner for Oxfordshire; Secretary of State for Defence v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The right to life, protected by article 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights, could extend to members of the Armed Forces, wherever they might be; whether it did so would depend on the circumstances of the particular case. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 8:44 am
Regina (Saunders) v Independent Police Complaints Commission and Another Regina (Tucker) v Same Queen’s Bench Division “The Independent Police Complaints Commission did not act incompatibly with human rights in not giving a direction to chief officers to prohibit conferring among police officers following a fatal shooting by them. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 2:44 am
Regina (G) v Governors of X School Queen’s Bench Division “An employee of a school facing a disciplinary committee for allegations of sexual misconduct was entitled to an enhanced measure of procedural protection afforded by article 6.1 of the European Convention on Human Rights, guaranteeing the right to a fair hearing, which included the right to legal [...] [read post]
12 Jan 2009, 1:52 am
H v Doncaster Youth Court Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “On a return to custody following release from a detention and training order, the period of the ‘remainder of the term’ was to be calculated from the date when it was proved to the satisfaction of the youth court that an offender had failed to comply with the [...] [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:28 am
Commissioner has power to delegate conditions Director of Public Prosecutions v Haw Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis could delegate his statutory power to impose conditions on demonstrations in the vicinity of Parliament. [read post]
23 Apr 2009, 1:56 am
Regina (Coleman) v Governor of Wayland Prison and Another Queen’s Bench Division “A prison governor had no power, whether under the Prison Rules (SI 1999 No 728) or the common law, to destroy a mobile telephone confiscated from a prisoner. [read post]