Search for: "R V"
Results 101 - 120
of 145,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Nov 2008, 10:30 am
R v Moulden [2008] EWCA Crim 2561; [2008] WLR (D) 352 “In s 6(2)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the words ‘proceedings before the Crown Court’ meant proceedings under a single indictment. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 2:19 am
R v. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 8:47 am
R v Sivaraman; [2008] WLR (D) 256 “There was no rule of law to the effect that, for the purposes of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, the amount of the benefit to each of the co-conspirators to a fraud must be taken as the whole amount of the loss attributable to the fraud: the amount of the benefit might vary as between the co-conspirators, and was to be determined on a common sense appreciation of the particular facts of the case. [read post]
2 Aug 2007, 7:38 am
R v Ukpabio “There is no power outside the statutory provisions of the Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999 to direct that a defendant can give evidence at his trial by live video link; however, in exceptional circumstances where it is appropriate for the defendant not to be present in court, there is power to direct that he can participate in his trial by other means such as live video link. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 2:08 am
R v K [2008] EWCA Crim 185; [2008] WLR (D) 47 “The offence of possessing a document containing information ‘of a kind likely to be useful to a person committing or preparing an act of terrorism’ was only committed if the document concerned was of a kind that was likely to provide practical assistance to such a person, rather than simply encouraging the commission of terrorist acts. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am
As such, it is very likely that R v Jordan will continue to play a role. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 3:27 pm
DISMISSED – Production and Possession of Marijuana for Sale, State v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 8:04 pm
Here is the abstract: This note provides commentary on the recent decision of the Australian Capital Territory Supreme Court in R v Forbes. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:11 am
R (Sandiford) v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs, heard 4 June 2014. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 4:00 am
In R. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2024, 4:50 pm
In R. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 2:00 am
R. (2022): The recent decision in R(BG and Anor) v Suffolk CC (‘Suffolk’) is a significant... [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 8:05 am
GREEN v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:28 am
R v Simcox [1964] Crim LR 402), sadistic sexually motivated attacks (R v Byrne [1960] 2 QB 396) and random killings by those inappropriately released from psychiatric hospital. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:33 am
On 18 February 2016, the Supreme Court handed down its much awaited judgment in the appeal of R v Jogee [2013] EWCA Crim 1433, which was consolidated with the Privy Council appeal of Ruddock v The Queen JCPC 2015/0020. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 6:11 am
Julian Rössler has published Politische Freiheit im Völkerrecht (Mohr Siebeck 2016). [read post]
20 Jan 2009, 1:53 am
R v Khan and others [2009] EWCA Crim 2; [2009] WLR (D) 8 “Where a member of the same household as a child or vulnerable adult was charged with allowing his or her death, the question whether the defendant had had frequent contact with him or her was a free-standing question, unrelated to issues whether that [...] [read post]
11 Feb 2010, 2:55 am
R v Carter (David) [2010] WLR (D) 29 “Where a member of the jury had to be discharged, at whatever stage of the trial, there was no requirement that the remaining members of the jury be directed to ignore the views expressed on any subject by the departed juror. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:21 am
R (A) v Secretary of State for Health [2009] EWCA Civ 225; [2009] WLR (D) 113 “A failed asylum seeker was not ‘ordinarily resident’ within the United Kingdom for the purposes of entitlement to treatment as of right by the National Health Service free of charge. [read post]
11 Jun 2007, 2:24 am
R v. [read post]
