Search for: "RECORD v. RECORD"
Results 101 - 120
of 71,761
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Oct 2023, 8:18 am
The denial of review in North Carolina Farm Bureau v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 5:01 am
In the recent decision of Amalgamated Bank v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 6:11 am
Yongdae Kim in Capitol Records v. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 5:06 am
” Gottemoller v. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 7:43 pm
The trial in Capitol Records v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
In the recent decision of Mehta v. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 6:53 pm
The recording of the oral argument in Dupree v. [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 7:10 pm
In the Manitoba case of Hart v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 6:41 am
Newman v. [read post]
13 Feb 2020, 6:41 am
Halper, Ellen V. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Transferable records Transferable records are those that carry property rights with them, so one can transfer the property by transferring the document. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 6:00 am
Most recently, the British Columbia Supreme Court found in Shalagin v Mercer Celgar Limited Partnership, 2022 BCSC 112, that Mercer (the employer) properly terminated its 12-year employee and senior financial analyst, Roman Shalagin, for cause because Shalagin had surreptitiously recorded numerous conversations with colleagues over a number of years. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 7:05 pm
In the recent decision of Kosinski v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:02 am
The standard is based on NBC Subsidiary (KNBC-TV), Inc. v Superior Court (1999) 20 C4th 1178, 86 CR2d 778. [read post]
17 Apr 2013, 2:41 pm
Details about this anti-SLAPP/appellate sanctions extravaganza at Kleveland v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:23 pm
Young v. [read post]
19 Aug 2019, 10:42 am
The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) recently considered the issue of covert recordings in Phoenix House Ltd v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, the Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court's ruling that a report prepared by an outside consultant for the agency was not shown to be eligible for the "intra-agency materials exemption" permitted by FOIL.Public Officers Law §87 sets out the "ground rules" for a party accessing government records. [read post]
16 May 2019, 4:00 am
Citing Matter of Xerox Corp. v Town of Webster, 65 NY2d 131, the Appellate Division sustained a Supreme Court's ruling that a report prepared by an outside consultant for the agency was not shown to be eligible for the "intra-agency materials exemption" permitted by FOIL.Public Officers Law §87 sets out the "ground rules" for a party accessing government records. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 4:42 am
Security records were properly admitted into evidence by disciplinary hearing officerPeil v Beirne, 72 AD3d 1095*In this appeal the Appellate Division held:1. [read post]
