Search for: "ROMANO v. THE STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2010, 2:39 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Sales, 4 NY2d 403, 407-408 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Braddock v Braddock, 60 AD3d 84, 90; Romano v Key Bank of Cent. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:57 am
Although it is unclear precisely what standard the Appellate Division applied, it cited its prior decision in Tapp v New York State Urban Dev. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:49 pm
Supreme Court was bound to acknowledge this reality, with a clear majority of the justices holding, in Lawrence v. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm by Sarah Madigan
Supreme Court’s decision in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st… [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:00 am by Guest Author
Circuit’s exacting standard of review in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 11:59 am by Susan Brenner
The Defendant cites two state court cases, McMillen v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:24 am by Giorgio Buono
; Benedetta Ubertazzi, Intellectual Property and State Immunity from Jurisdiction in the New York Convention of 2004. [read post]