Search for: "ROSE v. STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 2,597
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jul 2023, 5:00 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Moreover, there are no allegations related to breaching a promise to acehive a specific result, but only allegations about breaches of vague and non-specific (and somewhat boilerplate) provisions of the retainer agreement (see Mamoon v Dot Net Inc., 135 AD3d 656 [1st Dept 2016] citing Sage Realty Corp. v Proskauer Rose, 251 AD2d 3 5, 3 9 [1st Dept 1998] [ dismissing breach of contract claim as duplicative of legal malpractice claim where there were no allegations about a… [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian and BBC also report a demonstration at the Osbourne-Rogers wedding which Just Stop Oil has stated was not organised by them. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:33 pm by Barry Barnett
A change to venue law frees state attorneys-general from involuntary transfers of antitrust actions from their home states to distant forums handling multi-district litigation involving the same subject matter. [read post]
4 Jul 2023, 10:27 am by John Floyd
In fact, the murder rate in Republican states in 2019 and 2020 rose more per capita, 44 and 43 percent, over the 9 percent per capita in 2003-04. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 3:38 am by Benjamin Goh
The patents concerned are the same patent family that was successfully challenged before the US Supreme Court in Amgen v Sanofi, which you can read about here from Rose Hughes. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 1:07 am by INFORRM
On 19 and 20 June 2023 Steyn J heard the harassment case of Clarke v Rose. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 7:20 am by Terry Hart
Acuff-Rose Music, 510 US 569, 575 (1994). [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:00 am by Martin Kratz
Scuff-Rose Music, Inc. 510 U.S. 569 at page 579 (1994) quoting Folsom v. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 2:00 am by INFORRM
An Acoba spokesperson explained “the Ministerial Code states that ministers must ensure that no new appointments are announced, or taken up, before the committee has been able to provide its advice. [read post]