Search for: "Rais v. Holder"
Results 101 - 120
of 135
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Ray Patterson, Pope Brock Professor of Law, and Laura N. [read post]
3 Jun 2009, 8:55 pm
Abbott v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:09 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2008, 11:45 pm
Margaret Atwood on creativity (Michael Geist) National Graduate Caucus on copyright reform (Michael Geist) Supreme Court dismisses auto parts resellers' leave to appeal in action seeking expungement of trade marks for non-distinctiveness and abandonment: Hyundai Auto Canada v Cross Canada Auto Body Supply (West) Ltd & Ors (Canadian Trademark Blog) 'Why copyright? [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 3:19 am
From May 1 2004 to March 2008 the levies were subject to heavy litigation between the main Lithuanian collecting society (LATGAA) and IT wholesalers (case LATGAA v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 5:02 am
McDermott v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: CAFC sets strict standards to establish inequitable conduct: Star Scientific v R J Reynolds Tobacco: (Hal Wegner), (Maryland Intellectual Property Law Blog), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (Patently-O), (more from Patently-O), (Philip Brooks), (Law360), (I/P Updates), Safe harbour ruling in Io v Veoh could help YouTube in Viacom… [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Com’rs of Brevard Cnty. v. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
(IPKat) German Federal Supreme Court (Bundesgerichtshof) guidance regarding registrability of 'spa' in relation to beauty care products and spa services (Class 46) Europe ARMAFOAM: the ECJ rules on linguistic and changes OHIM's rules on conversion: Armacell v OHIM (CATCH US IF YOU CAN !!!) [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 12:38 pm
" She cited a letter sent to defendants that asks $7,500, saying that amount would increase up to $150,000 without prompt payment.The case is Voltage Pictures LLC v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
17 Oct 2015, 2:03 pm
© preemption is important in the 8thCir. b/c Ray v. [read post]
2 Aug 2008, 12:54 am
: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), Daiichi’s open offer for 20% in Ranbaxy awaits Sebi nod: (GenericsWeb), Australia/India: Strides shows thumbs up for Indian generic industry acquiring controlling interest in Ascent: (Spicy IP), Europe: Significant date ahead for EU Paediatric Regulation: (SPC Blog), India: Grave diggers, ‘immoral’ patent and the National Biotech Regulatory Authority: (Spicy IP), UK: Monster trade mark infringement case: court reveals its thinking… [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 11:31 am
Holder, in which the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
In Intel v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 12:38 pm
Golan v. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:44 am
(This is copyright, not patent, so I'll note it again tomorrow, but the rest of the panel is more patent-focused.)Lucas Osborn – 3D printing raises IP issues.Randy Picker – Reviews computer competition and innovation over last 100 years, including how WWII government contracting decisions shaped the computer patent environment.Michael Risch – 19th century apple-parer patents are instructive, including in showing how patent enforcement can channel innovation… [read post]
