Search for: "Read v. Turner" Results 101 - 120 of 579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
"Read the opinion and see if your thoughts on the issue reach a clearer conclusion than mine. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 7:38 am by Wells Bennett
The evidence, according to Lewis, will show that so far, Guantanamo force-feeding practices thoroughly violate legal standards set by the Turner v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 1:19 am by Karwan Eskerie
Sinclair v Information Commissioner and Department of Energy and Climate Change EA/2011/0052 (08 November 2011) – Read ruling The Environmental Information Regulations 2004 (“EIR”) did not require the Department of Energy and Climate Change (“DECC”) to disclose information concerning the government’s analysis of the potential cost to the UK of strengthened climate change commitments by the EU, the First-tier Tribunal (General Regulatory Chamber,… [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 11:30 am by Dan Ernst
Andrews): "'Impounded as a Stray': The English Legal Imaginary of Scotland in Henry V" Daniel Hulsebosch (Law, NYU): "Floors, Mirrors, and Ceilings in the Legal Architecture of Empire"Concluding RemarksModerators: Bradin Cormack and Lorna HutsonH/t: Michelle McKinley [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 11:55 am by admin
One moral to be taken from the court’s opinion in Coleman v. 688 Skate Park, Inc. and Jay Turner is this: Individuals participating in business transactions should read and understand all provisions of a contract before signing the contract. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:53 am by INFORRM
The cases include those brought by the Duke of Sussex, Nikki Sanderson, Fiona Wightman and Michael Turner. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
Judgment was handed down today by Mr Justice Bean in the libel case of Cooke and Anor v MGN ([2014] EWHC 2831 (QB)). [read post]
25 Aug 2023, 5:30 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Here, the defendants demonstrated, prima facie, that the acts that they allegedly failed to perform were beyond the scope of the engagement letter, which was prepared by the defendants and signed by the plaintiff (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d at 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [read post]