Search for: "Records and Information Services/Warrants"
Results 101 - 120
of 3,824
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2017, 8:30 am
In the government's view, a 2703 warrant compels action by a service provider (e.g. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 10:22 pm
The cell-site records count as a “record concerning an electronic communication service” under 18 U.S.C. 2703(c). [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 5:22 pm
Call Detail Records Don’t Actually Identify People The government still claims with a straight face that call detail records don't reveal private information, because they "do not include information about the identities of individuals," including “the name, address, [or] financial information” of any telephone subscribers. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
Last week, the en banc Fourth Circuit reversed the panel, ruling that under the third-party doctrine, a cell phone subscriber has no reasonable expectation of privacy in historical cell site location information that he or she shares with a service provider, so it isn’t a Fourth Amendment “search” when law enforcement obtains such information, and a warrant isn’t required. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 6:23 am
Last week, the en banc Fourth Circuit reversed the panel, ruling that under the third-party doctrine, a cell phone subscriber has no reasonable expectation of privacy in historical cell site location information that he or she shares with a service provider, so it isn’t a Fourth Amendment “search” when law enforcement obtains such information, and a warrant isn’t required. [read post]
5 Mar 2024, 4:12 pm
Communication Surveillance Law enforcement can obtain your call and text records from your service provider, revealing who you have communicated with and when. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:24 pm
Cell site location information is often stored by service providers for years. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 1:09 pm
. *** The Unfinished Business of Information Sharing: Why the FBI’s Criminal Justice Information Services Division belongs with DHS Darren E. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 2:35 pm
A warrant is still required even if no information is obtained at all. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:09 am
The SJC held that although the CSLI records were a business record belonging to and existing in the records of Augustine’s cellular servicer provider, Augustine had a reasonable expectation of privacy in the records that is recognized and protected by article 14. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 11:20 am
At three different times that evening, the service provider gave information about the location of the suspected burglar’s cell phone. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 7:46 am
Government requests for information may come in a variety of forms, from simple requests without a warrant or court order, to subpoenas, warrants, and NSLs. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 2:06 pm
You may not realize it, but the fact that you contract with the phone company for phone service means that all the information that the company has on you in their business records are not considered constitutionally protected. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:30 am
As I read the order, available as part of the record on appeal, AT&T was required to provide “precision location/GPS” information only for two days, but was required to provide “[c]omplete cell site information” from November 13, 2012 through December 12, 2012.) [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:52 am
On June 22, the Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision addressing privacy in the digital age, holding that the government generally must obtain a search warrant supported by probable cause to search a target’s historical cell site location information (CSLI), which can provide a detailed record of an individual’s whereabouts. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 1:23 pm
While imposing various confidentiality standards on court orders to release HIV-related information, the statute also states "service of a subpoena shall not be subject to this subdivision. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 8:33 am
It might also encourage Senator Leahy (D-VT) to require warrants for stored location information in the ECPA Reform Act, S.1011, which currently requires warrants for prospective location information, but not for stored location information. [read post]
29 Nov 2017, 11:43 am
Carpenter argued that prosecutors could not use the cellphone records against him because they had not gotten a warrant for them, but the lower courts disagreed. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 6:10 am
Bryan Hughes requiring warrants for the government to access personal location data from cell phone companies, cops from Dallas and Houston testified that historical information should be subject to a lower standard than a Fourth Amendment probable cause warrant because it's less accurate than real-time tracking. [read post]
16 Aug 2017, 10:45 am
” The post Do Police Need Search Warrants to Access Digital Information? [read post]
