Search for: "Reese v. Grant" Results 101 - 120 of 123
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nov. 20, 2002); Grant v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nov. 20, 2002); Grant v. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Nov. 20, 2002); Grant v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 7:20 am
(Ip's What's Up)   Africa New US Trade Representative - Afro implications (Afro-IP)   Argentina Official collective management organisation for film directors (IP tango)   Asia An Asian perspective on the credit crunch (Managing Intellectual Property)   Canada Scotch Whisky Association seeks leave to appeal FCA decision to the Supreme Court in trade mark battle over GLEN (Excess Copyright)   China Third revision of China’s patent law… [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:40 am
Reese, Cheyenne, Wyoming; Ronald L. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 3:18 am
Reese, Contract Appellate Counsel, of Michael Henry Reese, PC, Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 1:34 am
Reese, Appellate Counsel.Representing Appellee State: Bruce A. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 12:05 pm
Entities subject to the Open Meetings Law and the Freedom of Information LawMatter of Reese v Daines, 2008 NY Slip Op 51879(U), decided on September 15, 2008, Supreme Court, Erie County, Patrick H. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
Reese of Michael Henry Reese,** Cheyenne, Wyoming [*Order Granting Motion to Withdraw entered March 13, 2008. [read post]
19 May 2008, 8:55 am
Quarterman, No. 07-70017 An application for a certificate of appealability (COA) from a denial of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied in part and granted in part where: 1) the decision not to test DNA evidence from the crime scene did not rise to ineffective assistance of counsel since it was an informed, strategic decision; 2) failure to impeach a witness does not amount to a serious error ; 3) failure to present evidence that defendant was allergic to codeine caused no… [read post]
11 Oct 2007, 10:00 am
Dart Industries, Inc. (1981) 29 Cal.3d 462, 470; Reese v. [read post]