Search for: "Reiss v. Reiss" Results 101 - 120 of 128
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Mar 2018, 11:03 am by William Ford
The committee typically reviews takeovers and mergers after they occur, but several committee members have argued that the “boardroom battle itself” in Qualcomm v. [read post]
16 May 2022, 10:34 am by Katherine Pompilio
West, Brookings senior fellow; Isabel V. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am by Just Security
”  South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
3 Jan 2020, 1:27 pm
The existence of an ambiguity, if any, is to ʺbe ascertained from the face of an agreement without regard to extrinsic evidence.ʺ Reiss v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am by Don Chen
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
12 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
Two-Tier Partnership Tracks at AmLaw 200 Law Firms: Theory and Evidence Ruth Mason, Prospects for a Multilateral Treaty Between the United States and the European Union David Reiss, Subprime Standardization: How Rating Agencies Allow Predatory Lending to Flourish in the Secondary Mortgage Market and How They Can Be Stopped Michael Woronoff & Jonathan Rosen, Understanding Anti-Dilution Provisions in Convertible Securities [read post]
15 Dec 2017, 6:13 am
Wang (Harvard Business School), on Wednesday, December 13, 2017 Tags: Airgas v. [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 8:34 am
: (Patent Circle), Tanzania to conduct study on impact of counterfeit medicines: (Afro-IP), US: New rules on generic biological medicines under US Congressional debate: (Intellectual Property Watch), Pharma & Biotech - Products Acular (Ketorolac) – US: CAFC rules against Apotex reverse doctrine of equivalents: Roche Palo Alto & Allergan, Inc v Apotex: (Patent Circle), Carbatrol (Carbamazapine) – US: Federal judge allows Corepharma to seek DJ that its… [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 3:54 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Notwithstanding Mahoney-Buntzman, Justice Masley continued: ‘[W]hether partnership status is enjoyed turns on various factors, including sharing in profits and losses, exercising joint control over the business, and making capital investment and possessing an ownership interest in the partnership” (Mazur v Greenberg, Cantor & Reiss, 110 AD2d 605, 605 [1st Dept 1985], affd 66 NY2d 927 [1985] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 8:42 am by Dan Harris
Their work has taken on new significance since February, when President Vladimir V. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 10:39 pm
While the Court supports its ruling with over 50 pages of factual findings, its holding was essentially a foregone conclusion once the Court determined that it agreed with the reasoning of VFB LLC v. [read post]