Search for: "Reply in Support of Motion for the Release of Court Records" Results 101 - 120 of 206
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2022, 3:35 pm by Eugene Volokh
For these reasons, courts in this jurisdiction have consistently denied motions to unseal investigative records—including search warrant affidavits—in ongoing criminal investigations…. [read post]
15 Jun 2018, 7:32 am by Ken White
Requests for expedited proceedings, hearings, and discovery not clearly supported by the record and law are discouraged. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 5:53 am by Norman L. Eisen
What motions in limine did the parties file, and how did the court rule? [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
In general, courts have declined to seal, or have unsealed, records when the information is already publicly accessible. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 6:46 pm
Evid. 902(11) of its intent to offer certain records into evidence; 6) the evidence was insufficient to support a conviction; and 7) the district court erred in sentencing him on one count in finding the amount of intended loss from his actions to be around $811,000. [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 4:14 am by jonathanturley
Even in jail, Cohen was accused of lying to a court in violation of an order for early release due to medical problems. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 9:04 am by Emma Kohse
Next up is a defense motion concerning conflict of interest in the legal team. [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 12:09 pm by Anna Christensen
Even though the Supreme Court will have access to the entire record as it reviews the case, Mr. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 10:41 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Which brings us to last Monday, when the City of New York submitted its reply. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 4:24 am by Helen Klein
Jawad’s Reply Brief is set for release on Wednesday, February 24. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 2:00 pm by John Elwood
Today the Court released its decisi0n in HHS v. [read post]
1 May 2020, 12:32 pm by Quinta Jurecic, Benjamin Wittes
Notably, presumably because of the need to review the documents provided by Covington, the government has not yet filed a reply to Powell’s motion to withdraw her client’s guilty plea.) [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:00 am by Philip Thomas
January 2010 Order sanctioning Eaton for Intentional Discovery Violations part 1 August 2010 Special Master Report Regarding Renewed Motion to Dismiss and for Sanctions part 2 of special master report December 2010 Order Dismissing Eaton's Claims for Discovery Violations   February 2011 Frisby antitrust complaint against Eaton in North Carolina May 2012 Frisby Reply in Support of Motion to Stay Appeal to Miss. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 2:06 pm by Eugene Volokh
There is no record evidence before this court that shows that the "hyperlinked article" was in fact embedded as a hyperlink within Mr. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
  No fewer than four cases get remanded for correction of post-release controls, but the court correctly notes that the remand is for the limited purpose of properly imposing PRC, not for resentencing. [read post]