Search for: "Robert D Williamson"
Results 101 - 120
of 134
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2022, 11:46 am
David Williamson, Drummond Rennie, David Moher, Betsy J. [read post]
11 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm
While Sofaer criticizes the failure to initially respond with force to the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis, Roberts B. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 3:28 pm
Robert B. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
He seems different, in other words, form conservative nominees like Justices Gorsuch, Roberts, Alito, or Scalia, judges about whose nominations I did not bother to publish detailed analyses. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:39 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 529 U. [read post]
19 Apr 2014, 5:59 am
Grand View of Rivers and Mountains, Ma Yuan, Ming dynastyOn an existential level, when we recognize the extent to which our lives are molded by social constructs, we become able to free ourselves from a type of emotional entanglement that disturbs our tranquility. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am
(In the unpublished portion of its opinion, which won’t be further discussed in this post, the Court of Appeal held the trial court was correct in finding that substantial evidence supported a fair argument that the project may have a significant impact on the beetle, thus requiring an EIR, and also concluded the trial court did not err in upholding the County’s determinations that the project was consistent with the Williamson Act and County’s zoning code.) [read post]
26 Jan 2020, 4:24 pm
Euronews had a piece on a Dutch supporter of President Donald Trump filing a defamation suit against Robert Hyde, the GOP congressional candidate who sent text messages to Rudy Giuliani associate Lev Parnas suggesting the U.S. ambassador to Ukraine was under surveillance. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
[Editor’s Note: This post is based on a comment letter submitted to the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
., Daniel D. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am
Goguen, 415 U.S. at 580 (rejecting contention that limiting a statute criminalizing the contemptuous treatment of the U.S. flag to intentional conduct would "clarify what constitute[d] contempt, whether intentional or inadvertent")…. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
EARNHART AND ROBERT L. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
EARNHART AND ROBERT L. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
Health L. 109-147 (2011).Williamson, Jeremiah I. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:05 pm
Concluding that the EPA had claimed to discover “an unheralded power” to effect a “nationwide transition away from the use of coal to generate electricity,” it ruled in a 6-3 decision, authored by the Chief Justice, that: “[I]t is not plausible that Congress gave the EPA the authority to adopt on its own such a regulatory scheme in Section 111(d)” of the Clean Air Act.[18] Chief Justice Roberts’ decision, while greatly disappointing to… [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 9:39 am
A jailhouse snitch said Cook confessed to him that he’d killed Edwards. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
Box 7851 Madison, WI 53707-7851 Phone: (608) 266-9329 Web: http://www.dhfs.state.wi.us State Developmental Disabilities Planning Council Wisconsin Council on Developmental Disabilities 600 Williamson Street P.O. [read post]
22 Feb 2020, 4:12 am
Procedural and Factual Background Through the Settlement Enforcement Order, the court granted, in part, Tagnetics’ motion to enforce a settlement reached between it, as the putative Chapter 7 debtor in this case, and the Petitioning Creditors who filed an involuntary bankruptcy petition against Tagnetics.1 The integral terms of the Settlement Enforcement Order are as follows: 1 The original petitioning creditors who filed the involuntary petition against Tagnetics included the… [read post]
4 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
At Chief Justice Roberts' hearing four years ago, we heard him compare judges to umpires calling balls and strikes as they see them. [read post]
14 Oct 2011, 8:33 am
Hamilton Bank of Johnson City (1985) should be overruled, to the extent that it arbitrarily denies a federal forum to regulatory takings claimants seeking just compensation for the violation of their rights under the Fifth Amendment, contrary to the intention of Congress in enacting Section 1983; and (2) whether this Court should recognize an exception to Williamson County’s “state procedures” requirement for takings claimants like petitioner, whose Fifth Amendment claims… [read post]
