Search for: "Roberts v. Board of Elections"
Results 101 - 120
of 982
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2014, 8:04 am
Sure-Tan, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 4:12 pm
I can see Justice Kavanaugh writing a concurrence explaining that the clear statement rule should apply across the board, relying on Franklin v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 11:53 am
See more detail at the Pennsylvania Department of State's Election Returns website.] [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
At his Election Law Blog, Rick Hasen discusses the effects of Citizens United and super PACs on elections. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:23 pm
In New Process Steel v. [read post]
25 May 2016, 8:00 am
Pell v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 5:26 am
Next week the Court will hear oral arguments in Evenwel v. [read post]
21 May 2021, 7:31 am
Conceal Carry, held Administrative Trademark Judge Christopher Larkin of the Trademark Trial & Appeal Board, joined by Judges Linda Kuczma and Thomas Shaw (Coca-Cola Co. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Coverage of the Court was dominated by yesterday’s oral arguments in National Labor Relations Board v. [read post]
28 Apr 2008, 9:22 am
Marion County Election Board is a significant win for those who support stricter voter identification laws, even if they support such laws for partisan purposes. [read post]
18 May 2018, 11:16 am
Grand Traverse Band Election Board and Petoskey (Tribal Elections)Petoskey and Robert v. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 5:05 am
Board of Education would have upheld the racist precepts of “separate but equal” in Plessy v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 4:16 am
The controlling statute of limitations for filing an Article 78 petition challenging an administrative decision may be set out in another lawHayes v City of NY Dept. of Citywide Admin. [read post]
18 Oct 2020, 5:58 pm
North Carolina Board of Elections, U.S. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
Tags: Constitutional Law, Election Law, New Opinions, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 8:43 pm
White subjects judicial elections to the same body of case law as executive and legislative elections, it's possible that the NY Administrative Board of the Courts thought it had to set a threshold well above the invalidated Randall v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
Board of Education might not have been possible had the justices been concerned with the public opinion of their constituents. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 3:50 am
"The Appellate Division disagreed, holding that the County was under no contractual obligation to provide [Handy] with health insurance and, accordingly, it did not act arbitrarily or capriciously in terminating that benefit.The Handy decision should be contrasted with two other retiree benefits cases: Della Rocco v City of Schenectady and Andriano v City of Schenectady.The Schenectady cases differed in that they concerned executive action as opposed to legislative action and… [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am
In Edmond v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 9:16 am
” Similarly, in DNC v. [read post]
