Search for: "Roberts v. Bureau of Prisons"
Results 101 - 120
of 128
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 May 2010, 11:08 am
On May 17, 2010, the Supreme Court announced its decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 10:19 am
Yesterday the Court issued its decision in United States v. [read post]
1 May 2010, 11:37 pm
" The United States Department of Justice found that 5 percent of 9,691 sex offenders released from prison were re-arrested for new sex crimes within three years, according to a 2003 report released by the Bureau of Justice Statistics. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 1:30 pm
Rasul v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
The following is a summary review of articles from all over the nation concerning environmental law settlements, decisions, regulatory actions and lawsuits filed during the past week. [read post]
1 Apr 2010, 7:34 am
Freeland’s argument, the adoption of an across-the-board rule providing for a fixed reduction in crack cocaine sentences by the Sentencing Commission or Bureau of Prisons would be constitutionally suspect. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 12:39 pm
The Bureau of Prisons has a pressing need for more bed space in light of current crowded conditions. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:07 am
The case of Ashcroft -v- Iqal involved the aftermath of the 9-11 terrorist attacks in 2001. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
" Bureau of Prisons officials interpret "term of imprisonment" to mean time served, not the sentence imposed - a policy that results in seven fewer days of available credit for each year of the actual sentence, the petition argued. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:36 pm
Lenowitz, Robert D. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 12:39 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 9:49 am
Bureau of Prisons are among the most interesting cases of the term, suggesting that textualism as a serious interpretative practice is alive but not well at the SCOTUS. [read post]
18 May 2009, 9:53 am
Iqbal v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 2:38 pm
The federal Bureau of Prisons facility for most of those who have been certified as “sexually dangerous” is at Butner, N.C., in the Fourth Circuit’s area. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 7:44 am
IMPRINT Washington, D.C. : Bureau of National Affairs, c2001. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 9:47 am
., v. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 9:00 am
Software Pty Ltd v Bing Technologies Pty Limited (No 1) (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) Australian Bureau of Statistics going CC, under attribution-only licence (Creative Commons) (Michael Geist) Canada Depreciation a possible ground in opposition proceedings: Parmalat Canada Inc v Sysco Corporation (Canadian Trademark Blog) Trademarks Office considers changes to opposition practice (International Law Office) Parody defence not available according to BC… [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:16 am
" (Gregg v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 3:29 pm
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari (Federal government) Petition for certiorari (Sawyer, former Bureau of Prisons officials) Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply (Ashcroft) Petitioner's reply (Sawyer) Brief amici curiae of former Attorney General William P. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:21 am
Opinion below (2nd Circuit) Petition for certiorari (Federal government) Petition for certiorari (Sawyer, former Bureau of Prisons officials) Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply (Ashcroft) Petitioner's reply (Sawyer) Brief amici curiae of former Attorney General William P. [read post]
