Search for: "Roberts v. Patterson" Results 101 - 120 of 179
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2012, 1:53 pm by Peter Landers
Patterson in his 2001 book on the ruling. [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by INFORRM
On 21 December 2011, Eady J gave judgment in the “harassment” case of Neocleous v Jones ([2011] EWHC 3459 (QB)) Two judgments were also given in relation to “phone hacking indemnity” claims, Coulson v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3482 (QB)) and Mulcaire v NGN ([2011] EWHC 3469 (Ch)). [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
The question I’ve been asking in a series of recent posts is whether history can provide any insight into current claims that copyright law and the First Amendment conflict. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm by Law Lady
Roberts to suffer humiliation, an invasion of privacy and unwanted publicity as a result of the video made and disseminated without his consent, the lawsuit says. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 12:22 pm by David Tanenhaus
Pivotal Moments in American History Reading: Patterson, Brown v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 5:42 am by Mandelman
Insiders Include: Former Vice-President and General Counsel for Saxon Mortgage (now Morgan Stanley) (Dick Shepherd); Former Assistant General Counsel at Ocwen Financial Corporation and Department Manager of a major plaintiff’s foreclosure firm (Margery Golant); Former Managing Director and General Counsel for ACA Capital Holdings and CIFG Group and Deputy General Counsel at FitchRatings (Kathleen Cully) Former Vice President at New Century Mortgage in charge of document production and imaging… [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 11:16 am by Record on Appeal
Today, April 19, 2011, the Texas Supreme Court heard oral argument on rehearing in a case styled Severance v. [read post]
12 Apr 2011, 5:24 am by Ben Vernia
In a redacted decision on April 5, District Judge Robert Patterson of the Southern District of New York granted the defendants’ motion to dismiss in U.S. ex rel. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:46 am by Big Tent Democrat
& Trust Co., 265 U.S. 472, 486 (1924); whether related principles of law have so far developed as to have left the old rule no more than a remnant of abandoned doctrine, see Patterson v. [read post]