Search for: "Roberts v. State of Louisiana" Results 101 - 120 of 794
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2019, 7:56 am
Gee] concerns a Louisiana law that its opponents say would leave the state with only one doctor in a single clinic authorized to provide abortions. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 4:04 am by Edith Roberts
Last night the Supreme Court, by a vote of 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts joining the more liberal justices, blocked a Louisiana law that would require abortion providers to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals from going into effect pending appeal. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 3:44 am by Edith Roberts
” Leah Litman has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
5 Aug 2019, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
Louisiana, in which the justices will decide next term whether the Sixth Amendment’s guarantee of a unanimous jury applies to the states, to the Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 6:29 am by Will Baude
Louisiana, ending the practice of allowing non-unanimous juries to convict defendants of crimes—and again in the Court's refusal to make that decision retroactive in Edwards v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 7:12 am
Louisiana (07-1529). [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Four justices dissented, in an opinion authored by Chief Justice John Roberts. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:49 am by Amy Howe
Louisiana, in which the Court will consider (among other things) whether its 2012 decision in Miller v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 8:36 am
Robert Lee Berry, an anesthesiologist, was employed by Louisiana Anesthesia Associates (“LAA”), a practice that provided anesthesia services to hospitals throughout the state. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 10:54 am by Bernadette Meyler
Louisiana, 590 U.S. ___ (2020), which determined that states as well as the federal government must require criminal trial juries to reach unanimous verdicts. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 6:41 pm
Yesterday, after Chief Justice Roberts announced from the bench the Court’s opinion in Baze v. [read post]