Search for: "Roman v. New York State" Results 101 - 120 of 389
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2021, 10:50 am by Howard Bashman
The paper’s abstract begins, “In Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
28 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Maurice, decided Wednesday by the New York Appellate Division (Justice Sheri S. [read post]
23 Dec 2020, 12:16 pm by Stephen Wermiel
The Catholic diocese in Brooklyn challenged an order by New York Gov. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
The moving and opposition briefs were filed before the United States Supreme Court entered an injunction pendente lite in the case of Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn, New York v. [read post]
9 Dec 2020, 6:15 am by Robert Chesney, Steve Vladeck
Cuomo, concerning the application of the First Amendment Free Exercise Clause to New York’s emergency rules on maximum-occupancy for purposes of pandemic control Whither the NDAA? [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
It has been an interpretation of the Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth and Fifth Amendments that have told us what cannot be illegal (when a right is not enumerated against the federal government).Justice Gorsuch a few weeks ago wrote a concurring opinion in Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 5:46 am by SHG
The court noted that there was no evidence the institutions bringing the case, the Roman Catholic diocese of New York and Agudath Israel, had violated regulations applicable to nonreligious institutions or that gatherings there this summer had led to any outbreak. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 1:45 pm by Josh Blackman
I have now had some time to digest Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 11:03 am by Josh Blackman
This post is the sixth installment in my series on Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn v. [read post]
26 Nov 2020, 9:36 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That Second Circuit ruling has now been stayed by the Supreme Court, which holds that the order likely violates the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment.The case is Roman Catholic Diocese v. [read post]