Search for: "Romney v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 145
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2020, 11:51 am
The subcommittee staff’s analysis of the constitutionality of remote voting and participation focused heavily on whether a proposed change to the Senate’s rules, or the adoption of a new rule, would comply with the three-part test the Supreme Court established in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:42 pm
Two interesting amicus briefs in Obergefell v. [read post]
10 Oct 2011, 8:00 pm
On the other hand, freedom of speech and anonymity on the Internet are generally well-protected by our courts. 1995’s United States v. [read post]
5 Sep 2012, 7:10 am
See Bunney v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 1:00 pm
Kim Kardashian v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm
Obama - Care The gorilla in the room is litigation concerning the healthcare law (designated derisively by some as “Obama Care” but we in Massachusetts really know it more by its original name: “Romney Care”). [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:01 am
Did Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Scalia vote as they did in United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
The cumulative effect of the Roberts Court’s decisions in Citizens United v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 6:21 am
Hobbs and Miller v. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 8:17 am
A recent article by NYU law professor Richard Pildes suggested that several recent decisions by the United States Supreme Court, most notably Citizens United, fit the “counter-majoritarian” thesis to a tee. [read post]
22 May 2014, 7:44 am
For example, the New Deal/Civil Rights legacy may well give new support to religious conservatives, like Michael McConnell, who argue that the pervasive state interventionism of the modern era require a change in the constitutional base-line for assessing religious access to public facilities and subsidies. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 2:35 pm
Maybe You Can Take it With You: Post-mortem Publicity Rights in the United States/Marilyn Monroe World Trademark Review (pdf): http://www.worldtrademarkreview.com/issues/article.ashx? [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 5:26 am
Back in 2005, in Gonzalez v. [read post]
7 Feb 2015, 11:28 am
Now, county isn't the best unit for this study. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
” The next day, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg died.The majority of this column will discuss the potential chaos that faces the United States in the upcoming elections—chaos that could become much worse in the absence of Justice Ginsburg’s voice and vote. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 3:42 pm
What if I left the United States for a short trip? [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 6:49 am
” As proof, he cited Wickard v. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Hogan (invalidating same-sex admissions policy), considered her vote in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 8:56 am
Our explanation of the New Deal transformation is that the public kept reelecting Franklin Roosevelt to the White House and Democrats to the Senate, so that Roosevelt was able to replace eight Justices by the time the Court decided United States v. [read post]
